Wikiversity:Vision/2010

This Wikiversity page is inactive and is of historical interest. You may discuss this page on the talk page, copy all or part of this page to another page for further editing or start a new discussion about this page at the Wikiversity:Colloquium.

}

Community goals edit

this section is for ways to make Wikiversity more useful for the Wikiversity community.

Usability goals edit

this section is for ways to improve the usability of Wikiversity by making changes to Wikiversity.

Merge School and Topic namespaces edit

Confusion about whether something is a school, a department, or a topic is still a problem a year later. How are people using the school namespace? How are people using the topic namespace? How are people deciding which namespace to use for what?

Some sampling:

There is School:Medicine and Topic:Medicine.
There is School:Computer science and Topic:Computer science
There is School:Accounting and Topic:Accounting
There is School:Biology and Topic:Biology
There is School:Chemistry and Topic:Chemistry
There is School:Physics and Topic:Physics
There is School:Astronomy and Topic:Astronomy
There is School:Geography and Topic:Geography
There is School:History and Topic:History
There is School:Law and Topic:Law
There is School:Business and Topic:Business

Most of the topic pages in the sampling redirect to the school pages. How are people using the topic namespace? The answer appears to be as redirects. How are people using the school namespace? The answer appears to be to list other schools, since topics redirect to schools. If every topic can eventually be turned into a school than there appears to be no community need for both a topic and a school namespace. The straightforward solution would be to merge topics into schools, however topics are more definitive for learners to understand. I propose that the school namespace be dropped and the topic namespace be used in its place. -- dark lama 15:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support :-) edit

Oppose :-( edit

Neutral :-| edit

Discussion edit

I'm not much a fan of the Topic: and School: namespaces myself - content in there seems to go cold. I wouldn't be unhappy with all the content from Topic: and School: going into the main space. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 18:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have a sample organizational scheme that we could discuss upon. Since Wikiversity is a university of open learning, I say we adopt a formal layout of all the schools, departments, and topics. Something along the lines of this:

My suggestion is to break the university down into 7 major colleges (or faculties):

Agriculture
Business Administration
Engineering
Environmental Design
Humanities
Science
Social Sciences

A sample "college" might look something like this:

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

Aerospace Engineering Department
Chemical & Materials Engineering Department
Civil Engineering Department
Electrical & Computer Engineering Department
Engineering Technology Department
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Department
Mechanical Engineering Department

In addition, under each department can have subtopics.

By adopting this organization scheme, we then can start categorizing "classes" with an agreed acronym for each department. Take physics for example, we can agree to name it (PHY) and have all relevant courses and information numbered under that acronym (other acronyms can include something like CE=Civil Engineering, ECE = Electrical and Computer Engineering, etc..) Man4857 04:25, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outreach goals edit

this section is for ways to attract and get more people involved with Wikiversity through outreach efforts.

Has anyone tried asking our friends who can read/write or teach?