Feedback template for the topic development exercise for the motivation and emotion unit. Designed to be transcluded on a chapter talk page.

Simple example

Simple example

See also detailed example

<!-- Official topic development feedback -->
{{METF/2023
|1=
<!-- Title -->
#
|2=
<!-- Headings -->
#
|3=
<!-- Overview -->
#

|4=
<!-- Key points-->
#
|5=
<!-- Figure -->
#
|6=
<!-- Learning feature -->
#
|7=
<!-- References -->
#
|8=
<!-- Resources -->
#
|9=
<!-- User page -->
#
|10=
<!-- Social contribution -->
#

}}
~~~~

gives


The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Detailed example

Example use of the template which includes commonly used feedback comments:

<!-- Official topic development feedback -->
{{METF/2023
|1=
<!-- Title -->
# The title is correctly worded and formatted
# The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
# The wording and/or capitalisation of the title is incorrect. Be consistent with the [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2023|book table of contents]].
# The wording and/or capitalisation of the sub-title is incorrect. Be consistent with the [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2023|book table of contents]].
# Remove user name – authorship is as per the list of topics and the page's editing history
|2=
<!-- Headings -->
# See earlier comment about [[#heading casing|Heading casing]]
# Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic
# Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
# Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
# Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure
# Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for the larger section(s)
# Overly complicated 3-level structure – consider simplifying
# Messy heading structure – needs work
# Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure
# Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
# Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
# Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
# The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
# Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
# Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
# Definition(s) is a pedestrian heading. Incorporate definition material into the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information.
# Case study doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed case study within relevant sections
# Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections
|3=
<!-- Overview-->
# Simplify/abbreviate - move detail into subsequent sections
# Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
# A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section
# Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
# Add an image to the scenario or case study to help attract reader interest
# Add a scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest
# A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
# A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned
# Description of the problem/topic should be brief and evocative. Keep this section user-friendly. Move detail into subsequent section.
# Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
# Make this section user-friendly. Move details into a subsequent question.
# Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios)
# Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
# Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
# Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions
# Use single- rather than double-barrelled focus questions
# Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section
|4=
<!-- Key points-->
# Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
# Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
# Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
# Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
# For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
# ''Avoid providing too much background information''. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on ''directly answering the core question(s)'' posed by the chapter sub-title.
# Good balance of theory and research
# Promising balance of theory and research. Ideally, synthesise and provide examples.
# There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research
# Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples
# Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year)
# Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, write in your own words
# Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – [https://polishedpaper.com/blog/capitalization-apa-style more info]
# Write the chapter using [https://www.aresearchguide.com/write-in-third-person.html 3rd person perspective], although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective
# Use [https://www.abc.net.au/education/learn-english/australian-vs-american-spelling/11244196 Australian spelling] (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour)
# Move references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
# It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
# Is this [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Using generative AI|genAI content]]? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries otherwise it violates academic integrity.
# Conclusion (the most important section):
## Well developed
## Underway
## Under developed
## Hasn't been developed
## What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
# Generally well-written, but I recommend using the [https://uclearn.canberra.edu.au/courses/501/external_tools/262?display=borderless Studiosity] service and/or a service like [https://www.grammarly.com/ Grammarly] to help improve the quality of written expression because there are a lot of grammatical and spelling errors.
|5=
<!-- Figure -->
# Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
# A relevant figure is presented and captioned
# Well done on creating and uploading your own image! {{smile}} – this can also be listed as a social contribution
# A relevant figure is presented
# A relevant figure is not presented and cited
# The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
# Caption should include ''Figure X''. ...
# Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
# Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
# Cite each figure at least once in the main text
# Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view
# Consider decreasing image size to make it less dominant in relation to the text
|6=
<!-- Learning feature -->
# Excellent use of in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
# Promising use of in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
# One use of in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
# Include in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
# Excellent use of example(s)/case study(ies)
# Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
# Promising use of quiz question(s)
# Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question
# Promising use of table(s)
# Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
# Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
|7=
<!-- References -->
# Excellent
# Very good
# Good
# OK
# Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
# Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
# For [https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf APA referencing style], check and correct:
## alphabetical order
## capitalisation
## [[Help:Wikitext quick reference|italicisation]]
## [https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf doi formatting]
## make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
## page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
# None
# Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
# Use either APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both. Currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used.
|8=
<!-- Resources -->
# See also
## Excellent
## Very good
## OK
## One of out of two links provided
## Use bullet-points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
## Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Include source in brackets after link
## Include "(Book chapter, year)" after links to other motivation and emotion book chapters on Wikiversity
## Also link to related book chapters
## Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
## Not developed
# External links
## Excellent
## Very good
## OK
## Use bullet-points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
## Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Include source in brackets after link
## Only include links directly related to the sub-title
## Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population
## Not developed
# Good choice of links, but poorly formatted (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
|9=
<!-- User page -->
# Excellent – used effectively
# Very good
# Good
# Created – minimal, but sufficient
# Not created – see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]]
# Excellent description about self provided
# Description about self provided
# Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
# Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
# Add description about self
# Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
# Consider linking to your [https://portfolio.canberra.edu.au/ eportfolio] page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as [https://www.linkedin.com/ LinkedIn]. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
# Link provided to book chapter
# Link provided to book chapter (rename to make it more user-friendly)
# Add link to book chapter
|10=
<!-- Social contribution -->
# Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
# At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
# If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter#Making and summarising social contributions|Making and summarising social contributions]].
# Great to see you on X (formally known as Twitter)!
# Use a numbered list (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
# Add a brief summary of each contribution
# None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Physiological needs#Social contributions|Tutorial 03]]. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter#socialcontribution|social contributions]].
}}
~~~~

gives


The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
  3. The wording and/or capitalisation of the title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents.
  4. The wording and/or capitalisation of the sub-title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents.
  5. Remove user name – authorship is as per the list of topics and the page's editing history
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic
  3. Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
  4. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
  5. Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure
  6. Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for the larger section(s)
  7. Overly complicated 3-level structure – consider simplifying
  8. Messy heading structure – needs work
  9. Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure
  10. Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  11. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  12. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  13. The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
  14. Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
  15. Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
  16. Definition(s) is a pedestrian heading. Incorporate definition material into the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information.
  17. Case study doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed case study within relevant sections
  18. Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections
  1. Simplify/abbreviate - move detail into subsequent sections
  2. Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
  3. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the star
  4. Description of the problem/topic should be brief and evocative. Keep this section user-friendly. Move detail into subsequent section.t of this section
  5. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  6. Add an image to the scenario or case study to help attract reader interest
  7. Add a scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  8. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  9. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned
  10. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
  11. Make this section user-friendly. Move details into a subsequent question.
  12. Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios)
  13. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  14. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  15. Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions
  16. Use single- rather than double-barrelled focus questions
  17. Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  3. Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  4. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  5. For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  6. Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  7. Good balance of theory and research
  8. Promising balance of theory and research. Ideally, synthesise and provide examples.
  9. There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research
  10. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples
  11. Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year)
  12. Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, write in your own words
  13. Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info
  14. Write the chapter using 3rd person perspective, although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective
  15. Use Australian spelling (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour)
  16. Move references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
  17. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  18. Is this genAI content? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  19. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Well developed
    2. Underway
    3. Under developed
    4. Hasn't been developed
    5. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  20. Generally well-written, but I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression because there are a lot of grammatical and spelling errors.
  1. Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
  2. A relevant figure is presented and captioned
  3. Well done on creating and uploading your own image! – this can also be listed as a social contribution
  4. A relevant figure is presented
  5. A relevant figure is not presented and cited
  6. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  7. Caption should include Figure X. ...
  8. Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  9. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  10. Cite each figure at least once in the main text
  11. Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view
  12. Consider decreasing image size to make it less dominant in relation to the text
  1. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  3. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  4. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  5. Excellent use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  6. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  7. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  8. Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question
  9. Promising use of table(s)
  10. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  11. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  12. Excellent
  13. Very good
  14. Good
  15. OK
  16. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  17. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  18. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. alphabetical order
    2. capitalisation
    3. italicisation
    4. doi formatting
    5. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    6. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  19. None
  20. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  21. Use either APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both. Currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used.
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Very good
    3. OK
    4. One of out of two links provided
    5. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    6. Use sentence casing
    7. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    8. Include source in brackets after link
    9. Include "(Book chapter, year)" after links to other motivation and emotion book chapters on Wikiversity
    10. Only include links directly related to the sub-title
    11. Also link to related book chapters
    12. Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
    13. Not developed
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Very good
    3. OK
    4. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    5. Use sentence casing
    6. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    7. Include source in brackets after link
    8. Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population
    9. Not developed
  3. Good choice of links, but poorly formatted (see Tutorial 02)
  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. Created – minimal, but sufficient
  5. Not created – see Tutorial 02
  6. Excellent description about self provided
  7. Description about self provided
  8. Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  9. Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  10. Add description about self
  11. Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
  12. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  13. Link provided to book chapter
  14. Link provided to book chapter (rename to make it more user-friendly)
  15. Add link to book chapter
  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
  3. If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (o a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  4. Great to see you on X (formally known as Twitter)!
  5. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)
  6. Add a brief summary of each contribution
  7. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

See also