Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
Very brief description about self – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
A link to the book chapter is provided
Rename the link to the book chapter to make it more user-friendly (see Tutorial 02)
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The presentation makes reasonably good use of narrated audio
Audio communication is reasonably well-paced
Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the listener to cognitively process the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.
An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features)
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an outstanding chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem in an interesting, highly accessible way.
Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims
In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example.
Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., "(see Figure 1)"; do not use bold, italics, check and correct capitalisation).
Increase some image sizes to make them easier to read
Tables
Add an APA style caption to each table
Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1)
Citations use good APA style (7th ed.). To improve:
If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either:
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Excellent use of figure(s)
Excellent use of table(s)
Reasonably good use of feature box(es)
Excellent use of scenarios, case studies, or examples
Reasonably good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than as a set of questions at the end
Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Use alphabetical order
Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section
~2 logged discussion post contributions with direct links to evidence
~1 logged Wikiversity contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess. See tutorials for guidance about how to get direct links to evidence.