Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.
Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence
If adding the second or subsequent link to a page, create a direct link like this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.
Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
Overview - Consider adding:
a brief, evocative description of the problem (focusing on PAT -> D)
Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Promising balance of theory and research
Include more in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just noting that, as we've discussed, this psilocybin assisted therapy and depression chapter is a more specific look (focusing on depression), but related to this other chapter about psilocybin assisted therapy in general: Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Psilocybin assisted psychotherapy. Provide an embedded a link to this other chapter early on in the chapter. There may be some overlap, which is fine, but the other chapter should serve as a gateway chapter to more specific psilocybin assisted therapy chapters such as this one on depression. -- Jtneill - Talk - c11:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, the quality of written expression is good
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes.
Layout
Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections
Grammar
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance.
Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[2]
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Basic use of feature box(es)
Very good use of quiz(zes)
Excellent/Very good/Good/Basic/No use of case studies or examples
Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Basic use of external links in the "External links" section. Include sources in parentheses.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An opening slide with a title is displayed — ideally, use the same title and sub-title as the book chapter to help clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
This presentation has a very engaging introduction to hook audience interest
A context for the topic is established
Establish a context for the topic (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand
Overview of topics is presented; consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
The correct chapter title and sub-title are missing from the name of the presentation — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A written description of the presentation is not provided. Providing an informative description can help viewers decide whether they want to watch or not.