Literature/1926/Russell
| Authors | ||
|---|---|---|
| A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z & |
||
Reprints
editExcerpts
edit- I have not space to deal with the many topics occurring in other parts of The Meaning of Meaning. There are discussions of beauty, of the folly of philosophers, of the wisdom of savages, and a host of subjects more or less cognate to the main theme. [c 1]
Wikimedia
editChronology
edit- W. Terrence Gordon, ed. (1994). C. K. Ogden and Linguistics (5 Volumes). London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press. [^]
- Literature/1983/Barwise [^]
- Literature/1982/Evans [^]
- Rorty, Richard (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press. [^]
- Chisholm, Roderick (1976). Person and Object: A Metaphysical Study. London: G. Allen & Unwin. [^]
- Literature/1976/Dummett [^]
- Literature/1976/Evans [^]
- Literature/1976/Skinner [^]
- Cole, Peter & Jerry L. Morgan, eds. (1975). Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Act. New York: Academic Press. [^]
- Minsky, Marvin (1975). "A Framework for Representing Knowledge," in: Winston, Patrick, ed. (1975). The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 211-77. [^]
- Putnam, Hilary (1975). Mind, Language and Reality, Philosophical Papers Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press. [^]
- Literature/1970/Kripke [^]
- Quine, Willard (1960). Word and Object. MIT Press. [^]
- Chomsky, Noam (1959). "A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior." Language, 35(1): 26-57. [^]
- Gellner, Ernest (1959). Words and Things: A Critical Account of Linguistic Philosophy and a Study in Ideology. London: Gollancz. [^]
- Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. [^]
- Russell, Bertrand (1957). "Mr Strawson on Referring." Mind 66: 385-389. [^]
- Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Acton, Massachusetts: Copley Publishing Group. [^]
- Austin, J. L. (1955). How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955, ed. by J. O. Urmson. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962. [^]
- McCarthy, John; Marvin Minsky; Nathan Rochester & Claude Shannon (1955). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. [^]
- Black, Max (1954). "Metaphor." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55, pp. 273-294. [^]
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishing. [^]
- Strawson, Peter (1950). "On Referring." Mind, vol. 59, no. 235, pp. 320-344. [^]
- Ryle, Gilbert (1949). The Concept of Mind. University Of Chicago Press. [^]
- Korzybski, Alfred (1933). Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. 5th ed., Institute of General Semantics, 1994. [^]
- Magritte, René (1933). The Human Condition (La condition humaine). National Gallery of Art, Washington DC. [^]
- Wells, H. G. (1933). The Shape of Things to Come. Hutchinson. [^]
- Magritte, René (1929). The Treachery of Images (La trahison des images). Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, California. [^]
- Russell, Bertrand (1926). "The Meaning of Meaning." Dial, vol.81 (August 1926) pp. 114-121. [^]
- Literature/1923/Sapir [^]
- Ogden, C. K. & I. A. Richards (1923). The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. [^]
- Watson, John B. (1922). "The analysis of mind," Dial, vol. 72, pp. 97-102. (Review of Russell, Bertrand (1921). The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin. [^]).
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Frank P. Ramsey & C. K. Ogden, trans., Kegan Paul, 1922. [^]
- Russell, Bertrand (1921). The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin. [^]
- Watson, John B. (1913). "Psychology as the behaviorist views it," Psychological Review, 20, pp. 158-177. [^]
- Russell, Bertrand (1905). "On Denoting." Mind, vol. 14, pp. 479-493. [^]
Reviews
edit- W. Scott Wood (1986). "Bertrand Russell's Review of The Meaning of Meaning," Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, vol. 45, no. 1 (January 1986) pp. 107-113. [3]
Comments
edit- ↑ This closing passage may have made many if not most of Russell's fellow philosophers become angry at the book as (perhaps unjustly) exposing their folly as contrasted with the wisdom of savages, hence as if they had been worse than savages. According to w: General semantics #Criticism,
- Peter Strawson, in a review of Black’s book, commented on the chapter "Korzybski’s General Semantics" that it was "a subject which, to judge from the quotations from Science and Sanity, was hardly worth Professor Black’s attention."
Notes
edit
http://books.google.com/advanced_book_search
|
|---|
| The shade of the bar looks invariant in isolation but variant in context, in (favor of) sharp contrast with the color gradient background, hence an innate illusion we have to reasonably interpret and overcome as well as the mirage. Such variance appearing seasonably from context to context may not only be the case with our vision but worldview in general in practice indeed, whether a priori or a posteriori. Perhaps no worldview from nowhere, without any point of view or prejudice at all!
Ogden & Richards (1923) said, "All experience ... is either enjoyed or interpreted ... or both, and very little of it escapes some degree of interpretation." H. G. Wells (1938) said, "The human individual is born now to live in a society for which his fundamental instincts are altogether inadequate." |