Talk:WikiJournal of Medicine/Medical gallery of Mikael Häggström 2014
WikiJournal of Medicine
Open access • Publication charge free • Public peer review • Wikipedia-integrated
This article has been through public peer review.
First submitted:
Accepted:
Article text
PDF: Download
DOI: 10.15347/wjm/2014.008
QID: Q44276778
XML: Download
Share article
Email
| Facebook
| Twitter
| LinkedIn
| Mendeley
| ResearchGate
Suggested citation format:
Mikael Häggström (25 July 2014). "Medical gallery of Mikael Häggström 2014". WikiJournal of Medicine 1 (2). doi:10.15347/WJM/2014.008. Wikidata Q44276778. ISSN 2002-4436. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiversity/en/7/7b/Medical_gallery_of_Mikael_H%C3%A4ggstr%C3%B6m_2014.pdf.
License: This work is released into the public domain by the copyright holder (under a CC0 license). This applies worldwide. Any person may use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.
Editors:Mikael Häggström (handling editor) contact
Reviewers: (comments)Helena Scheele-Sandström
Article information
Review
Previous discussions about this work is found at My talk page in Wikipedia. Mikael Häggström (discuss • contribs) 18:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Review by Helena Scheele-Sandström ,
These assessment comments were submitted on , and refer to this previous version of the article
The mentioned images are now removed from the article. Mikael Häggström (discuss • contribs) 18:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Post-publication peer review
Comments below refer to the version of this article as published
Add a post-publication review or comment
Including images
Content taken from published sources that is adapted by relabeling, redrawing, etc., is acceptable if you cite the source when the image is used.
Content that you generate yourself, in the laboratory, or otherwise, is ENTIRELY unacceptable at Wikipedia, as it amounts to prohibited WP:Original research. Given the seeming WP:OR that is rampant with your images, and the negative peer review that casts a further shadow over their reliability, I will begin to look at each, and where they are used, and tag them as inappropriate (if you do no provide sources for derived work, and remove work that is WP:OR).
This is an example of a lack of clear guidance from wikipedia regarding doing honest scholarly work, that you have taken to a logical, albeit damaging extreme. You should be generating images from scholars, and not involving your own research and interpretation.
Le Prof Leprof 7272 (discuss • contribs) 23:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- This discussion relates to Wikipedia, so further discussion takes place at the corresponding entry there. Mikael Häggström (discuss • contribs) 17:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)