Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Values in action framework of strengths

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings (or sentence casing). For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@U3185269KL: Note this recommendation about heading casing. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Capitalisation of the title/sub-title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents User page Created Description about self Add link to book chapter Social contribution None summarised with links to evidence. Summarised with indirect links to evidence. Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. Use a numbered list. Add a brief summary of each contribution. Section headings Promising 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development by refining the structure. Some standard sections were missing (now added). Key points None Image Add APA formatting and refer to in main text. References None Resources None

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:16, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment

Hi, here are some basics notes that could help you with your wiki page. Basically VIA is a psychological measuring systems that tries to illustrate an individuals key strengths. Once an individuals strengths have been recognized, the system tries to help them improve that/those strength/s as well as understand why those characteristics are their strengths. The idea of the VIA is to improve an individuals psychologically well-being by making an individuals life more desired. Their are six virtues (Wisdom and Knowledge, Courage, Humanity, Justice, Temperance and Transcendence) each with their own minor virtues within them.

Here are some articles to get you started:

VALUES IN ACTION (VIA) CLASSIFICATION OF STRENGTHS http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.485.384&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Acceptance and Values-Based Action in Chronic Pain: A Study of Treatment Effectiveness and Process https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lance_Mccracken2/publication/5316175_Acceptance_and_Values-Based_Action_in_Chronic_Pain_A_Study_of_Treatment_Effectiveness_and_Process/links/0912f50b660086745e000000/Acceptance-and-Values-Based-Action-in-Chronic-Pain-A-Study-of-Treatment-Effectiveness-and-Process.pdf

Furthermore, it may be worthwhile analyzing the validity and reliability of the theory. You may also want to consider where the theory arose from (Positive Psychology) and why.U3175664 (discuss • contribs) 08:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Comment

Hi, I can see you have started an outline for this chapter and your topic looks very interesting. I wonder if you could discuss the application of values in treatment for different mental health conditions. I know there is research supporting value work in motivational interviewing which can be applied to all sorts of mental health concerns. It may even be worth looking at the application in a population with low self-esteem and values that have been impacted by their condition e.g. eating disorders, drug and alcohol addiction.

I have included some articles that may assist if you think this is a good suggestion.

An Examination of Adolescents’ Values in a Motivational Interviewing-based Obesity Intervention

WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT EATING DISORDERS: THEIR VALUES AND EATING ATTITUDES

https://addictionfreedomnow.com/blog/values-addiction-recovery/

Hope this helps :)

--MGibb.23 (discuss • contribs) 05:33, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Initial suggestions

@U3185269KL: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Positive psychology
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Values
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title is correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Promising 3-level heading structure Structure could be improved by: Removing the definitional sub-headings and incorporating the planned content into the general introduction to the section (i.e., before the first sub-heading) Removing sub-headings from the Conclusion – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Probably the Introduction heading isn't needed - consider incorporating this material into the Overview and/or the What is the VIA framework sections instead. Comparison with DSM isn't required to address the question but could be an interesting way to address the theory/research about the VIA Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure If retaining the comparison with DSM, consider adding a related focus question 3. Overview A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section Add an image to the scenario or case study to help attract reader interest Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations There seems to be good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research Excellent emphasis on examples/applications Note to use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year) and alphabetical ordering of multiple citations Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed Underway Remove/move sub-headings 5. Figure A relevant figure is not presented and cited (see Tutorial 2 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Promising use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: italicisation doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) 8. Resources See also One of two links provided External links Not developed 9. User page Very good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter 10. Social contribution None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading style

@U3185269KL: Use default heading styles (i.e., remove bold). Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. # The Overview, Conclusion, use of learning features, and social contributions could be improved. The title and sub-title were incorrect (fixed) Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Over the maximum word count. Content beyond 4,000 words has been ignored for marking purposes. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Underdeveloped Engage reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Briefly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon; provide more detail Add focus questions in a feature box Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained This chapter does not build on related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles (e.g., by embedding interwiki links for key terms) Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Use tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Very good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Reasonably good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Reasonably good summary and conclusion Too long - goes over the maximum word count Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Avoid one sentence paragraphs. Communicate one idea per paragraph using three to five sentences. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional italics, bold, and/or change in font size) See earlier comments about heading casing Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[2] Abbreviations Only use abbreviations such as e.g., i.e., et al., etc. inside parentheses, otherwise spell them out APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Citations use basic APA style (7th ed.). To improve: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses List multiple citations in alphabetical order by first author surname References use reasonably good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Insufficient use of learning features No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. No use of figure(s) No use of table(s) No use of feature box(es) Reasonably good use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Also include links to related book chapters Add more links Not counted for marking purposes due to being over the maximum word count No use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution No logged contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)