Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Ulysses pact and motivation

Edit suggestion

hello, I believe all our headings and subheadings are meant to be in sentence casing, hope this helps! U3173387 (discuss • contribs) 14:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi L.Mercer. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development ~~~~

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement There is no indication of psychological science/research in the headings, although this can be covered within the suggested headings Remove full-stop from end of heading Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure 3. Overview Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios) Does this section include genAI content? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity. Remove bold soft-headings and abbreviate Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section Excellent use of citations Promising balance of theory and research Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info Use Australian spelling (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour) Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view 6. Learning feature Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References OK Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: remove numbered list alphabetical order capitalisation italicisation make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable) 8. Resources See also One of two link types provided Also link to related book chapters Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters) Use alphabetical order External links Good Use sentence casing Include source in brackets after link Use alphabetical order 9. User page Good Brief description about self – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making: comments on the talk pages of other chapters (past or current) posts about the unit or project on other platforms such as the UCLearn discussion forum or on X using the #emot24

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and some use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. I suspect that some of this chapter is based on unacknowledged use of genAI output; if so, it violates academic integrity principles. There is an excellent acknowledgement of its use for the Conclusion section. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon The focus questions are clear and relevant Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds exceptionally well on other chapters and Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Basic use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Very good integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Conclusion Very good summary and conclusion Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Grammar The grammar for some/many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[2] Check and correct use of that vs. who Spelling Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation – more info APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, communicate about concepts in your own words Figures Reasonably well captioned Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.). To improve: Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses References use very good/good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Include hyperlinked dois (fixed) Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters Basic use of figure(s) No use of table(s) Very good use of feature box(es) Excellent use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Reasonably good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Also include links to related book chapters Add more links Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Add more links Social contribution ~3 logged, useful, minor contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:12, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation Overview The opening slide(s) clearly conveys the purpose of the presentation Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic No clear definition of UP is provided An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes very good/ use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes very good use of citations to support claims The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples The presentation provides practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides an very good summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides reasonably good take-home message(s) Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Good intonation The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was excellent The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read Consider increasing line spacing to make the text easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a reasonably good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well/ matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent. Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:25, 8 November 2024 (UTC)