Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Therapeutic horticulture

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed) 2. Headings Basic, 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Write for an international rather than Australian audience Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios) Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended 4. Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with some relevant citations Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression such as checking grammatical and spelling errors Conclusion (the most important section): 5. Figure Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented, captioned, and cited 6. Learning feature Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles Also link to other relevant book chapters Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable) 8. Resources See also Very good Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters) Use alphabetical order External links Not developed 9. User page Not created – see Tutorial 02 10. Social contribution None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Great topic

After having a quick read of your work, this sounds like a really interesting topic to explore

Annabelle Taylor (discuss • contribs) 04:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter There is some misaligned of the content to the topic e.g., why is TH compared to psychopharmacological interventions? (this was not part of the title or sub-title). If making a comparison (to help address the question of effects) why not compare to other psychological therapies too, such as talk-based therapies? Write for an international rather than Australian audience Reasonably good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Solid Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon The focus questions are basic The focus questions could be improved by: being more specific to the topic (i.e., the sub-title) (e.g., the topic doesn't include motivation) using open-ended rather than closed-ended Theory A reasonably good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds reasonably well on other chapters and/or Wikipedia articles The chapter could be improved by providing a clearer description of TH (e.g., define and explain how it is similar/different from related interventions and what sorts of activities/processes are used, where does it take place, who is it run by, etc.) Reasonably good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Some use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Basic integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Conclusion Basic summary and conclusion Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is OK but there are several aspects which are below professional standard Some sentences could be explained more clearly (e.g., see the and tags) Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Layout Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Grammar The grammar for many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance Check and make correct use of commas Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[2] Check and correct use of that vs. who Abbreviations Once an abbreviation has been established (e.g., TH, use it consistently aftwarwards Only use abbreviations such as e.g., i.e., et al., etc. inside parentheses, otherwise spell them out Spelling Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation – more info APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[3]. Video (1 min) Express numbers < 10 using words (e.g., two) and >= 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 99) Figures Very well well captioned Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example. Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., "(see Figure 1)") Citations use excellent APA style (7th ed.) References use very good: Use hanging indent (fixed) Include hyperlinked dois (fixed) Provide the full titles of journals Learning features Reasonably good use of learning features Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of figure(s) No use of table(s) Reasonably good use of feature box(es) Very good use of scenarios, case studies, or examples No use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order Include sources in parentheses after the link Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Include sources in parentheses after the link Target an international audience Add more links Social contribution ~5 logged, useful, minor contributions with direct links to evidence

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit. Content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes. Overview The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a very good way The opening scenario could be abbreviated The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A context for the presentation is established through an example Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic There is too much content, in too much detail. Provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of content well than a large amount poorly. The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes reasonably good use of citations to support claims The presentation makes good/ use of one or more examples The presentation provides good practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Very good intonation The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was reasonably good The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes very good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a very good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent. A reasonably good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Very good use of time codes An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is not clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC) -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)