Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Subjective wellbeing heritability and changeability

Heading casing

 
Hi Sebastian Siakimotu. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

~~~~


Topic development feedback

edit

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

 
  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. Messy heading structure – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  3. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  4. The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
  5. Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
  6. Definition(s) tend to be pedestrian headings. Incorporate definitional material into the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information.
  1. Very good
  2. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  3. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  4. Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios)
  5. Remove key points feature box from Overview
  6. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section
  2. Promising development of key points for each section
  3. Basic development of key points for each section
  4. Partial development of key points for some sections
  5. No development
  6. Excellent use of citations
  7. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  8. Reduce the initial material and expand the material about the relationship between WB and genes/environment
  9. Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  10. Move links to references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
  11. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed
  12. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  1. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Very good
  2. Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. remove extra apostrophes around the title
    2. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
  2. External links
    1. OK
    2. Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population
    3. Include source in parentheses after the link
  1. Very good
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. At least three different types of contributions with indirect link(s) to evidence
  2. To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity edits or comments: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Subjective wellbeing heritability and changeability" page.