Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Rejection sensitivity

Initial suggestions

@Yonis Yousufzai: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Relationships
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi James hope you're doing well, just have a quick question regarding AI, when it comes to analysing a pdf file I use Ai to tell me about the content inside if it's related to my topic and then I cite it myself. When it comes to source editing since its a kind of coding that makes me confused and lost so I use ChatGPT to generate the code, for instance, for the attachment theory from Wikipedia I copy the URL and then AI gives me the code for Wikiversity on how to put it in the text do I have to say that in the references? Here is one of the links for a better understanding of what I mean.

Regards Yonis

https://chatgpt.com/share/b176fa04-d82a-4c16-acdb-29ad3c88b485 Yonis Yousufzai (discuss • contribs) 01:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Yonis,

Thanks for questions about using genAI (and discussing in class).

These are reasonable/acceptable uses that do not require acknowledgement.

However, be aware that genAI makes mistakes and that you are responsible for those mistakes.

Ideally, you should also be reading the original sources yourself, even if you are using genAI to help summarise key points from the article. But asking for text summarisation is usually reliable.

I also noted that it suggested some ways of making links which are not as good as what was taught in Tutorial 2 (i.e., it is suggesting adding Wikiversity links as external rather than internal links).

So, remember, genAI can provide helpful but imperfect assistance, so user beware.

Sincerely,

James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:14, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi Yonis Yousufzai. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title is correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Use sentence casing (e.g., Jealousy -> jealousy) Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings (I've fixed this) 3. Overview Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions Keep the Overview brief; consider moving detail into subsequent sections A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios) Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions Use single- rather than double-barrelled focus questions Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section 4. Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research Has the most important peer-reviewed research about this topic been identified? For example, are there any systematic reviews about this or related topics? Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples Generally well-written, but I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression because there are some noticeable grammatical and spelling errors. Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed 5. Figure A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text 6. Learning feature Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Promising use of quiz question(s) Promising use of table(s) 7. References Very good Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) 8. Resources See also OK Change linking style to internal linking (see Tutorial 02) Use sentence casing External links OK Use sentence casing Rename and format links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02) Include source in brackets after link 9. User page Good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter 10. Social contribution None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)