Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Pain and motivation

Heading casing

Hi Gabriel Geld. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Definition(s) tend to be pedestrian headings. Incorporate definitional material into the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information. 3. Overview Hasn't been developed – Needs scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions 4. Key points No development 5. Figure Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2) Consider use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Excellent use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Insufficient Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic 8. Resources See also Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2) External links Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2) 9. User page Good Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided Rename the link to the book chapter to make it more user-friendly (see Tutorial 02) 10. Social contribution Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making: direct improvements to other chapters (past or current)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a good chapter. It makes good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Reasonably good Engage reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image (a subsequent case study has been moved to the start of the Overview) Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon Clear focus questions Theory A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds somewhat on previous, related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Very good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Use tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Very good use of one ore more examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Basic integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Conclusion Very good summary and conclusion Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Develop the bullet point statements into full sentences and paragraphs Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Layout The chapter is reasonably well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Abbreviations Check and correct formatting of abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e., etc.) APA style Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as ... as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Direct quotes need page numbers Figures Figures are very well well captioned Use this format for figure captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text The figure numbering needs correcting Citations use reasonably good APA style (7th ed.). To improve: Do not include author first name or initials References use basic APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Reasonably good use of learning features Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. Very good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Very good use of case studies or examples Very good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use bullet points per Tutorial 02 Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Use bullet points per Tutorial 02 Social contribution ~8 logged, useful, mostly minor social contributions with mostly direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation Overview The opening slide(s) clearly conveys the purpose of the presentation Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., use an example or explain importance) Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes excellent use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples The presentation provides good practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides an basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides basic take-home message(s) Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was excellent The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes very good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a reasonably good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)