Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Nudge theory

Initial suggestions

@U3225022: Thanks for tackling this topic.↵Some initial suggestions:

Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:

• Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Behaviour
• Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Environment
• Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Motivation

Also search past book chapters for related topics For the topic development, consider: What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic? What is the main research in this area? Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi U3225022. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed) 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. No heading needed for case studies. Instead, embed case studies/scenarios throughout the chapter. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Promising balance of theory and research. Ideally, synthesise and provide examples. Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info Conclusion (the most important section): Underway 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2) Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Promising use of quiz question(s) Use Australian spelling Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Very good Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation 8. Resources See also OK Use internal linking style (see Tutorial 02) External links Excellent Use sentence casing. Note that Youtube should be YouTube 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Several of the links are broken Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making: direct improvements to other chapters (past or current) Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview The opening clearly conveys the purpose of the presentation Engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes insufficient/no use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes basic use of citations to support claims The presentation makes excellent use of examples The presentation provides good practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides an excellent summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Excellent intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was reasonably good The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent The presentation makes very good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Why is "UNOFFICIAL" shown on each slide? The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in an excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources are communicated in a general way A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box; also include a relevant image (fixed) Explains the psychological problem or phenomenon reasonably well The focus questions are clear and relevant Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on other chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Basic use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised The focus questions are addressed Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Layout See earlier comments about heading casing Spelling A few words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[1]. Video (1 min) Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used ... as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA Style 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Figures Reasonably well captioned Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses References use very good/ APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Learning features Very good use of learning features Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Use in-text interwiki links, rather than external links to Wikiversity chapters, per Tutorial 02 Move links to non-peer-reviewed sources to the External links section Basic use of figure(s) No use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) Excellent use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use alphabetical order Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Use alphabetical order Social contribution ~22 logged, useful, mostly moderate to major contributions with direct links to evidence ~1 logged contribution without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess. See tutorials for guidance about how to get direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)