Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement
The planned headings seemed to be structured around single citations; instead provide synthesis and integration across the best psychological science on this topic
Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
Usually an "Introduction" section isn't necessary because the Overview should do this job and, if there is additional detail, consider using more more descriptive heading(s)
Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
Consider use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
Promising use of quiz question(s)
Focus quiz question(s) on the take-home messages
Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
Very brief description about self – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
A link to the book chapter is provided
Rename the link to the book chapter to make it more user-friendly (see Tutorial 02)
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
The main area for potential improvement is greater reliance on your own reading and writing and less on genAI content
Basic use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims; in some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Overall, the quality of written expression is OK but there are aspects which are below professional standard
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Layout
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
The structure may be overly complicated (i.e., too many sections overall)
Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional italics, bold, and/or change in font size)
Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of figure(s)
No use of table(s)
Good use of feature box(es)
Basic use of scenarios, case studies, or examples
Very good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent.
Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers