Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Lateral violence among Indigenous Australians

Initial suggestions

@Smritiadhikari: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Indigenous/Australian
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Violence
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi @smritiadhikari your book chapter is looking great! I just wanted to suggest for your case study to maybe include more specific details such as a specific job title and area that the work will be to create more realism.

Heading casing

Hi Smritiadhikari. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Promising 3-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement Simplify to a 2-level structure Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections 3. Overview Very good Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section Excellent use of citations Promising balance of theory and research For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Use 3rd person perspective, although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective Use Australian spelling (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour) Conclusion is well developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view Consider decreasing image size to make it less dominant in relation to the text 6. Learning feature Add in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2) Consider use of more scenarios/examples/case studies Promising use of quiz question(s) Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question Embed the questions in relevant sections rather than having as a separate section Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good 5 out 6 references supplied Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation 8. Resources See also Very good Use sentence casing Some spaces were missing (fixed) External links Very good Some spaces are missing Use alphabetical order 9. User page Basic Very brief description about self – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback

Hi @Smritiadhikari

I just read through your page and noticed that your not using wikiversity's quiz function for your quiz, i wanted to let you know that you can insert a quiz that can display your same true/false questions and automatically grade peoples answers.

Below I've included the wikiversity tutorial for the function

Help:Quiz-Simple

Best of luck on your chapter U3230258 (discuss • contribs) 21:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter. It makes good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. I suspect that some of this chapter is based on unacknowledged use of genAI output; if so, it violates academic integrity principles Basic use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims Better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box; also include a relevant image (fixed) Explains the psychological problem or phenomenon reasonably well The focus questions are excellent (clear and relevant) Theory A good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained This chapter does not build on related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles (e.g., by embedding interwiki links for key terms) Very good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Good use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information In many places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Research Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal In many places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Reasonably good integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional italics, bold, and/or change in font size) See earlier comments about heading casing Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour) Proofreading Remove unnecessary capitalisation – more info Figures Overly detailed caption Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example. Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., "(see Figure 1)") Tables Use APA style for captions (see example) Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1) Citations use excellent APA Style (7th ed.): References use basic APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Basic use of learning features No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Insufficient use of figure(s) Good use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) Basic use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Consider adding quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use sentence casing Add more links Insufficient use of external links in the "External links" section Add more links Social contribution No logged contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit. Content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes. Overview The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a good way The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A basic context for the presentation is established Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic There is too much content (goes over time). Provide a higher-level presentation. It is better to cover a small amount of well-selected content well than a large amount poorly. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes reasonably good use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of examples The presentation provides good practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The audio is easy to follow The audio is hard to follow because so much content is presented so quickly The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Excellent/Very good/Good/Reasonably good/Basic intonation The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was excellent The narrated content is reasonably well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is basic The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The amount of text presented on one or more slides could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in basic way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is basically produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent. Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated A copyright license for the presentation is not clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)