Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Excellent work. Your chapter is well-structured, beginning with a clear introduction and transitioning into the scientific aspects of intertemporal choice. The case study of Sophie provides a relatable and practical example that helps to illustrate the theoretical concepts, making the content more engaging for readers. To further enhance the depth and thoroughness of the chapter, you could add in more quizzes providing further engagement, particularly those that examine practical applications of intertemporal choice in decision-making scenarios. This would increase its practical value for readers interested in applying these insights to real-world contexts. Well done!--Princess Brutus (discuss • contribs) 08:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Promising, 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure
Remove emotion. This is a motivation topic.
Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
Usually an "Introduction" section isn't necessary because the Overview should do this job and, if there is additional detail, consider using more more descriptive heading(s)
Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.
Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard
Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of figure(s)
No use of table(s)
Reasonably good use of feature box(es)
Very good use of scenarios, case studies, or examples
No use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
rather than as a set of questions at the end
Reasonably good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Latest comment: 2 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
The presentation addresses the topic
There is too much content (goes over time). Provide a higher-level presentation. It is better to cover a small amount of well-selected content well than a large amount poorly.
The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory
The presentation makes insufficient/no use of relevant psychological research
The presentation makes insufficient/no use of citations to support claims
The presentation makes basico use of examples
The presentation provides basic practical advice
The presentation provides easy to understand information
The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.
A link to the book chapter is not provided
A link from the book chapter is provided
The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.