Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Fandom motivation

Initial suggestions

@TEGIANN: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Social
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Links

Hi, I found this one interesting to read about. I would recommend linking some of your references in so we can have a look into the topic a bit more but otherwise looking forward to your completed project.

Emdawson02 (discuss • contribs) 09:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

potential suggestions

Hi Teeghan,

Great job with all the psych theory links to what motivates fandom using all of those you have should give your chapter questions good direction and keep them on topic.

maybe something like; what the types of fandom different from one another?

I think you will be able to find some super cool case studies to use for fandoms, I could think maybe the beetles fandom back in the day. taylor swift and maybe a sports team or player like manchester united or cristiano ronaldo who has the most followers of anyone on instagram.

good luck.

--Ubaldo111 (discuss • contribs) 02:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi TEGIANN. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development ~~~~

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand) The draft headings place too much emphasis on background Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Usually a "Background" section isn't necessary because the Overview should do this job and, if there is additional detail, consider using more more descriptive heading(s) 3. Overview Hasn't been developed 4. Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2) Consider use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent 9. User page Basic – minimal, but sufficient Very brief description about self – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making: direct improvements to other chapters (past or current)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a good chapter. It makes good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims Better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and [ https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2024%2FFandom_motivation&diff=2675978&oldid=2665548these copyedits] Overview Solid Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a somewhat relevant image Explains the problem or phenomenon Avoid repetition of subsequent content Underdeveloped focus questions Theory A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on related chapters and Wikipedia articles Very good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Use tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent/Very good/Good/Reasonably good/Basic/Insufficient review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Very good summary and conclusion Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is OK but there are several aspects which are below professional standard Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Layout The chapter structure is underdeveloped; consider expanding Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Grammar The grammar for some/many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance APA style Use serial commas[1]. Video (1 min) Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used ... as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Figures Briefly captioned; provide more detail to help connect the figure to the text Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) (fixed) Citations use excellent APA style (7th ed.) References use reasonably good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Very good use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of case studies or examples Reasonably good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) The quiz questions could be improved by being more focused on the key points and/or take-home messages Reasonably good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~3 logged, useful, moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is under the maximum time limit (3 mins), so there was room for further development Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed. Also narrate or paraphrase the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. The presentation has an opening verbal scenario; consider using a corresponding slide/image A context for the presentation is established Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation somewhat addresses the topic The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes basic use of citations to support claims Sometimes is unclear which citations relate to which point The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples The presentation provides reasonably easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides vbasic take-home message(s); ideally, address the focus questions The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Basic intonation The narration could benefit from further scripting and/or practice Audio recording quality was basic The narrated content is reasonably well matched to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic Video Overall, visual display quality is reasonably good The presentation makes reasonably good/basic use of text and image based slides The font size could be larger to make it easier to read The amount of text presented per slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a reasonably good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well/ produced using simple tools The visual content is reasonably well matched to the target topic Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features)# A link from the book chapter is provided The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated A copyright license for the presentation is not clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)