Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
Consider use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter
Socialcontribution|social contributions]].
It seems likely that Tutorial 2 and 3 haven't been completed
Social contributions found on chapter page and have been moved to user page. There are no direct links to evidence.
Latest comment: 7 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.
Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour)
Figures
Well captioned
Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example.
Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1)
No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of figure(s)
No use of table(s)
No use of feature box(es)
Limited use of scenarios, case studies, or examples
Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
No use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
No use of external links in the "External links" section
~3 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess. See tutorials for guidance about how to get direct links to evidence.
Latest comment: 5 hours ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate or paraphrase the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter.
The presentation has a reasonably good introduction to engage audience interest
A context for the presentation is established
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone.
The narrated content is well/reasonably well matched to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.
An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features)