Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Employee recognition and work motivation

Initial suggestions

@U3235875: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Social
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Work
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:57, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title is correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. I think it might help to have a section explaining extrinsic vs. intrinsic motivation and how this related to ER Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section Add an image to the scenario or case study to help attract reader interest (I've moved Figure 1 into the scenario for now, but you may want to change) A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Great that you've identified cognitive evaluation theory - that is arguably the lynchpin in determining with ER enhances intrinsic or extrinsic motivation The Reeve textbook is overused as a citation. Instead, go to original, peer-reviewed, academic sources. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Good balance of theory and research Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed 5. Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Promising use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Very good Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation doi formatting - use the shortest, simplest doi that works page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter 10. Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Some pieces for your research

Hi there!

I'm currently doing a chapter on Abusive Supervision and my area is pretty similar to yours int terms of sources, and thought I might just drop off some sources to help out if you needed them :).

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68

Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0149206307300812

Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580-590.

https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580

I would recommend giving these a run through SciHub as some of them are very difficult to access, if not I'd be happy to give you some PDFs with the page numbers I have included.

These sources are really good for intrinsic motivation, and I used them to show how my topic greatly effects the SDT, if you want I am happy to give a couple more sources.

Hope this helps!

TD TJDuus (discuss • contribs) 05:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback for book chapter

Hey,

The structure for your book chapter is coming along really well. I could easily follow your presentation of ideas and found it interesting to read!

I found a systematic review and meta-analysis from 2016 titled "The Relationship Between Organizational Culture, Intrinsic Motivation, And Employee Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". I thought this could help you to critically analyse the current field of research for this topic. I found the 'suggestions for further research' and 'summary' particularly interesting!

Hope this helps! U3216883 (discuss • contribs) 02:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Potential theory

Hi @U3235875,

Your book chapter looks like it's coming along great! It looks like you already have a great range of relevant theory, but in reading your chapter I realised I have done an assessment previously on a similar topic, and found that Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory was really useful in explaining the different factors that contribute to motivation in the workplace. This is an article I found pretty useful and you can access it through the UC library, but here is a PDF https://rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/files/articole/2023-06-28/3718/4orobosa.pdf U3236338 (discuss • contribs) 13:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem in a friendly, interactive, informative way. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims Move non-peer reviewed links into the External links section For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Basic focus questions Use open-ended rather than closed-ended focus questions Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds reasonably well on related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Effective use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional italics and/or bold) (fixed) See earlier comments about heading casing Tables Table captions use APA style or wiki style Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Citations use excellent APA style (7th ed.) References use excellent APA style: Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Learning features Excellent use of learning features Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Use in-text interwiki links, rather than external links, per Tutorial 02 Good use of image(s) Excellent use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of case studies or examples Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~13 logged, useful, mostly minor social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation Overview An opening slide with the title is displayed but not narrated. Also display and narrate the sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research Ideally, make more explicit use of research The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/insufficient/no use of citations to support claims Use APA style for citations The presentation makes good use of one or more examples The presentation provides practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a very good summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic Add a conclusion slide with the take-home messages Audio The audio is hard to follow because of the music competing with low volume narration The presentation makes promising use of narrated audio, but hard to distinguish from music Audio communication is well paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording/mixing volume was problematic Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is OK, but many parts are difficult to read due to distracting colours/animation The presentation makes reasonably good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication could be improved by reducing the background animation The presentation is reasonably well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation An excellent written description of the presentation is provided Excellent use of time codes Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)