Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Emotional literacy

Heading casing

Hi RBasu3243278. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up, I will fix it when I have the time. RBasu3243278 (discuss • contribs) 00:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

FYI, I've returned the page name to the original casing (i.e., sentence casing) as per the style being used for previous and current other chapters. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

This is a reminder about using correct casing for the headings and sub-headings -- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Initial suggestions

@RBasu3243278: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Emotion
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Emotional intelligence
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:43, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Artical

Hi, @RBasu3243278

I Found this article which may be of interesting to you Andrade, C., Tavares, M., Soares, H., Coelho, F., & Tomás, C. (2022). Positive Mental Health and Mental Health Literacy of Informal Caregivers: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15276-. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215276

It explores how mental/ emotional health literacy, is linked to positive mental health outcome. this ties in well with your heading Improved Mental Health Why is emotional literacy important? U3236683 (discuss • contribs) 14:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed) 2. Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed 5. Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text The source can be removed from the caption because clicking on the image will provide the meta-data Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2) Promising use of one ore more scenarios/examples/case studies Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Excellent use of one or more tables Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc. 7. References Good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting use dois where available include hyperlinked dois 8. Resources See also Excellent Use alphabetical order External links Excellent Use alphabetical order 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Link(s) to professional profile(s) doesn't allow access even after logging in A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Clear focus questions Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on related chapters and Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Effective use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Very good summary and conclusion Some new concepts were introduced (e.g., triumph) which should have been covered earlier (or not included in the conclusion) Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance Check and correct use of that vs. who Abbreviations Check and correct formatting of abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e., etc.) Only introduce abbreviations which are subsequently used APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[1]. Video (1 min) Figures Very well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) Tables Table captions use APA style or wiki style Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) Citations use excellent APA style (7th ed.) References use reasonably good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Move non-peer reviewed links into the External links section Learning features Very good use of learning features Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. Basic use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Reasonably good use of image(s) Very good use of table(s) Very good use of feature box(es) Basic use of case studies or examples Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Consider expanding Good use of external links in the "External links" section Use alphabetical order Social contribution ~12 logged, useful, mostly moderate to major social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a good to very good presentation Overview The opening slide(s) conveys the purpose of the presentation in a basic way The sub-title is not displayed or narrated Engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is established through an example Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses/somewhat addresses/does not adequately address the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes very good/ use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes reasonably good use of citations to support claims The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples The presentation provides useful practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Provide easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides an excellent summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides excellent take-home message(s) Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was basic Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes very good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent. A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)