Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Ego resilience

Heading casing

Hi U322995. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

@U322995: This is a reminder about heading capitalisation. Also note that "Ego" should "ego" throughout the chapter. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed) 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand) Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections 3. Overview A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned Direct quotes need page numbers. Even better, write about concepts using your own words. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions 4. Key points Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples Move links to academic articles into the References Move links to external resources into External links Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info (e.g., Ego should be ego) Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) 6. Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Promising use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Insufficient Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Don't cite the image. Clicking on the image provides the meta-data. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable) use dois where available instead of other links Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic 8. Resources See also Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2) External links Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2) 9. User page Basic – minimal, but sufficient Very brief description about self – consider expanding Link(s) provided to professional profile(s) A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient chapter The main area for potential improvement is the quality of written expression Basic use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims Better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Reasonably good Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image The case study could be abbreviated Explains the problem or phenomenon The explanation of the topic could be abbreviated (move detail into subsequent sections) Basic focus questions Theory A basic range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained The chapter could be improved by making a clearer distinction between "psychological resilience" (a different topic e.g., bouncing back after a challenging experience) and "ego resilience" (topic of this chapter e.g., being flexible and adaptable during a challenging experience). In some places in this chapter, the distinction appears to have been muddied. Builds on one previous, related chapter and/or Wikipedia article Build more strongly on related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Basic/Insufficient depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Insufficient use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Basic review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Many claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Basic integration between theory and research Conclusion Basic summary and conclusion Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is below professional standard. UC Study Skills assistance is recommended to help improve writing skills Some sentences could be explained more clearly (e.g., see the tags) Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout See earlier comments about heading casing Grammar The grammar for many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance Check and make correct use of commas Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[2] Check and correct use of affect vs. effect Spelling Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour) Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., inconsistent use of ego-resiliency vs ego resiliency) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[3]. Video (1 min) Figures Briefly captioned; provide more detail to help connect the figure to the text Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.). To improve: Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses References use very good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[4] Learning features Basic use of learning features No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very basic use of image(s) Good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Reasonably good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Ideally, choose more relevant links Reasonably good use of external links in the "External links" section Ideally, choose more relevant links Social contribution No logged social contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is established Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes basic use of citations to support claims The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples The presentation provides practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a good summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic and take-home message(s) Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was very good The audio is a bit buffery (may be too close to mic) The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes very good use of animated text and image based slides The simultaneous letter-by-letter revealing is visually distracting The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The visual communication is effectively supplemented by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The video title does not match the chapter title and sub-title — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and be more consistent A very good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Excellent use of time codes Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)