Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Ego development and psychological growth

Initial suggestions

edit

@Ryanjboulton: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:09, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

edit

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

 
  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Messy heading structure – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
  3. Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  4. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  5. The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
  1. Hasn't been developed – Needs scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  1. Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  1. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  2. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  3. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned
  2. The relevance of the figure to the topic is unclear
  3. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  4. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  1. Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Consider use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Good
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. All references need to be cited in the text
  4. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. proofreading
    2. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
  1. See also
  2. External links
  1. Basic – minimal, but sufficient
  2. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making:

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

 

Overall

edit
  1. Overall, this is an reasonably good presentation
  1. The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a good way
  2. The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
  3. A basic context for the presentation is established
  4. Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation
  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses/somewhat addresses/does not adequately address the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research
  6. The presentation makes very good/ use of citations to support claims
  7. The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples
  8. The presentation provides basic practical advice
  9. The presentation provides reasonably easy to understand information
  1. The conclusion provides an very good summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic
  2. The conclusion provides reasonably good take-home message(s)
  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
  2. The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to
  3. The audio is easy to follow
  4. The audio is hard to follow because so much content is presented so quickly
  5. The presentation makes effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of narrated audio
  6. Audio communication is well-paced
  7. Good intonation
  8. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  9. Audio recording quality was excellent
  10. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic
  1. Overall, visual display quality is good
  2. The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read
  5. The amount of text presented on some slides could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time
  6. The visual communication is supplemented in an reasonably good way by relevant images and/or diagrams
  7. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  8. The visual content is well matched to the target topic
  1. The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. At least one of the images has been used without copyright owner permission
  3. A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply


Book chapter review and feedback

edit

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

 

Overall

edit
  1. Overall, this is a good chapter. It makes excellent use of psychological theory and basic use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims
  3. Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand
  4. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
  1. Well developed
  2. Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image
  3. Clearly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon
  4. The focus questions are reasonably good
  1. An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. Builds effectively on other chapters and/or Wikipedia articles
  3. Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  4. Excellent use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  5. Key citations are well used
  6. Consider using more examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
  1. Basic review of relevant research
  2. More detail about key studies would be ideal
  3. Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area?
  4. Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  5. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. considering the strength of relationships
    3. acknowledging limitations
    4. pointing out critiques/counterarguments
    5. suggesting specific directions for future research
  1. Insufficient integration between theory and research
  2. The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance
  3. Insufficient integration with chapters
  1. Excellent summary and conclusion
  2. Key points are well summarised
  3. Clear take-home message(s)
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
    2. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
    2. Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings (fixed)
    3. Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
  3. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent
  4. APA style
    1. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used ... as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA Style 7th ed., 2020, p. 159)
    2. Figures
      1. Reasonably well captioned; provide more detail to help connect the figure to the text
      2. Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example.
      3. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style
    3. Tables
      1. Use APA style for captions (see example)
      2. Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text
    4. Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.). To improve:
      1. List multiple citations in alphabetical order by first author surname
    5. References use excellen APA style
    6. Include hyperlinked dois (fixed)
  1. Very good use of learning features
  2. Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Basic use of figure(s)
  5. Excellent use of table(s)
  6. Basic use of feature box(es)
  7. Basic use of scenarios, case studies, or examples
  8. No use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
  9. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
    1. Use alphabetical order
  10. Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section
    1. Use alphabetical order
  1. ~20 logged, useful, mostly minor contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Ego development and psychological growth" page.