Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Bibliotherapy and emotion

Initial suggestions

@GurmeenK: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Emotion
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Psychotherapy
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi GurmeenK. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Messy heading structure – needs work (see Tutorial 2) Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections Usually an "Introduction" section isn't necessary because the Overview should do this job and, if there is additional detail, consider using more more descriptive heading(s) Case study doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed case study within relevant sections 3. Overview Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions Very good OK Basic Does this section include genAI content? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity. Hasn't been developed – Needs scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned Focus questions are well developed The headings should aligned more closely with focus questions Move the focus questions to the end of the Overview with sub-title and top-level headings 4. Key points Promising development of key points for each section Very good use of citations Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Conclusion is underway What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text 6. Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Excellent Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent 9. User page Good Brief description about self – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making: comments on the talk pages of other chapters (past or current)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

References

Hi Gurmeen! I was just looking at your book chapter and noticed your references didn't have italics for the journal article and the volume number. I find it easier to do this by clicking 'edit source' instead of 'edit', then you can highlight the sections easily to change it. Your page is looking incredible and very informative! Looking forward to seeing the end result. Tatteredwing (discuss • contribs) 05:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Very good to excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Solid Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Scenario could be improved by being more clearly about bibliotherapy and emotion Explains the problem or phenomenon Overly focused on students Could be abbreviated, with detail moved into subsequent sections Mostly clear focus questions One focus question adjusted Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Perhaps could focus more on emotions involved in bibliotherapy Builds effectively on related chapters and Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Basic use of tables, figures, and/or lists are to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Basic use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are well referenced Integration Very good to excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Could emphasise take-home messages Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent APA style Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Figures Figures are very well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use bold) Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.) List multiple citations in alphabetical order by first author surname References use excellent APA style: Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles Reasonably good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Very good use of feature box(es) Very good use of case studies or examples Good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~4 logged, useful, moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation, but lacks coverage of relevant research The presentation is under the maximum time limit (3 mins), so there was room for further development Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Also narrate title/sub-title Engaging introduction to hook audience interest A basic context for the presentation is established Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes no use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples. What does Alex read? Why? What happens? The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies The presentation provides practical advice The presentation could be improved by providing practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Provide easy to understand information Conclusion Provide a conclusion slide which summarises the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical, take-home messages in response to each focus question Audio The audio is easy to follow The presentation makes reasonably good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Reasonably goodintonation The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was good Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation An excellent written description of the presentation is provided An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated, although the links are not active A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)