Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Autism and motivation

Heading casing

Hi Sophiedriscoll. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much for that, James! I will definitely change this before my chapter is due, just a force of habit ':D

I'm also wondering as there doesn't seem to be a specific number on the book chapter information or rubric, but is there a specific amount of social contributions we need to have in our book chapter, as opposed to our topic development which just needed 3? If it depends and isn't definitive, that's fine, just wondering if I missed an actual number. Also wondering this for 'see also' and 'external links' amounts. Sophiedriscoll (discuss • contribs) 04:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sophie,

If you haven't already, check out the social contributions guidelines for the book chapter assessment exercise here: Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter#Social contribution (10%). Feel free to ask follow-up questions.

Sincerely,

James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Also wondering (just while you're here I hope it's okay if I ask a few questions, just ignore if not), I prefer to capitalise Autism but would it be better to just not capitalise it, or say ASD instead? Also, I have definitely picked a very niche topic with not much research on it, specifically, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Should I make it a point to say this in my chapter so you know I would include it if there were any? There's not much research at all on this topic besides just the different things that can influence motivation like PDA, executive function etc.. I'm doing my best with this, but it's a bit tricky.

Sorry for the questions, I hope its okay for me to ask. Hope you're having a nice weekend and no worries if you can't get back to me. Thanks James Sophiedriscoll (discuss • contribs) 04:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sophie,

APA style is a "down" style, so autism wouldn't be capitalised. More info: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/capitalization.

I suggest clarifying the similarities/differences for autism vs. ASD but this is only relevant to the extent that this distinction helps to understand motivation.

The task is to synthesise what is known about the topic based on psychological science. Where the science may be lacking, then provide critical analysis to point this out (e.g., the current warning box of the top could be integrated into the main content).

This article may be of interest: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143096/

Sincerely,

James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.) Remove trailing colons Remove acronym#Noun|acronyms from headings 3. Overview Under-developed Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section 4. Key points Promising development of key points Excellent use of citations Promising balance of theory and research Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view 6. Learning feature Excellent in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to relevant book chapters Excellent use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Promising use of quiz question(s) Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable) 8. Resources See also Excellent External links One of two required external links provided 9. User page Very good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making: To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity edits or comments: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. This was demonstrated in tutorials. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 2)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Word count

@Sophiedriscoll: Note that the current version is approx. 5,000 words, so is over the maximum 4,000 word count. Usually the key is to cut down on definitional/background conceptualisation and narrow the focus to addressing the sub-title question. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview The opening clearly conveys the purpose of the presentation Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes insufficient/no use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes insufficient/no use of citations to support claims The presentation makes reasonably good use of examples The presentation provides useful practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides an excellent summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides excellent take-home message(s) Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was very good Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes very good use of text and image based slides The font size is mostly sufficiently large to make it easy to read Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it mostly easy to read and listen at the same time The amount of text presented on one or more slides could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a very good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well/ produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation An excellent written description of the presentation is provided Very good use of time codes Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter. It makes excellent use of psychological theory and insufficient use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Move embedded external links to academic articles into the References section, include links as dois, and provide APA style citation to the article in the main body text Move embedded external links to non-peer-reviewed sources into the External links section For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engaging case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Explains the psychological problem or phenomenon reasonably well The focus questions are very good Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds exceptionally well on other chapters and Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Excellent use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used In many places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Excellent/ use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Insufficient review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? In many places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Many claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Insufficient integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Insufficient integration with chapters Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "as previously mentioned") because it's usually unnecessary. If needed, use section linking. Layout Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional italics, bold, and/or change in font size) Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used ... as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA Style 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Express numbers < 10 using words (e.g., two) and >= 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 99) Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, communicate about concepts in your own words Figures Briefly captioned; provide more detail to help connect the figure to the text Add captions Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Increase some image sizes to make them easier to read Tables Add an APA style caption to each table Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text Citations use very good APA Style (7th ed.): References use good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles Add embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of figure(s) Very good use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) Excellent use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Very good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Move external links into the External links section Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~5 logged, useful, moderate contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)