Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Simple 2-level heading structure - this size can be effective
BUT significantly reduce "What is extraversion?" and "What is dopamine?" and significantly expand "How does dopamine affect extraversion?" (i.e., I would expect the latter section to have more sub-headings and to be significantly longer)
Avoid having section
s with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
Conclusion (the most important section):
Well developed
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there,
this topic looks so interesting! I would love to see a table to clearly display either the extraversion history from the four psychologists you have included or a table to show the difference/compare the contemporary measurement. Mia Pearse (discuss • contribs) 05:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
Some paragraphs are overly long. Communicate one key idea per paragraph in three to five sentences.
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Layout
Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159)
Figures
Figures are very well captioned
Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1)
Citations use excellent APA style (7th ed.). For example:
List multiple citations in alphabetical order by first author surname
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Very good use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Good use of feature box(es)
Very good use of case studies or examples
Reasonably good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than as a set of questions at the end
Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Use alphabetical order
Good use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
Provide an informative description to help viewers decide whether they want to watch
A link to the book chapter is not provided
A link from the book chapter was not provided. I've added it.
The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.