Hi! Love the topic you chose. Nice!!!
Some basic edits and comments to help you continue.
1. Not sure why some of the contents page is in bold...odd!
2. You NEED a title and subtitle. Sort out immediately to make sure you can continue writing. If you don't have a title, you can't really link anything together...
3. I would consider doing a whole section on 'definitions' not just a subheading. You can have pictures and start a case study there as well
4. You seem to randomly go from task initiation as the topic to autism...this is why a title is VITAL and CRITICAL because it helps the reader know what the heck they are going to read! At the moment, you have really gone left field. To help here are some suggestions:
"What is task initiation? Task initiation and its relation with Autism"
--> Check with Dr. Neil first
5. If you want to touch on ADHD as well, you might consider a heading that says
"What is task initiation? Tak initiation and its implications among those who are neurodivergent"
That's about it! Happy chapter-ing!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
16/10/21- U3144808 - Congrats on a great chapter so far, you might be interested in checking out my chapter - Boredom and technology addiction - What is the relationship between boredom and technology addiction and what can be done about it? - U3144808. you might be able to draw some similarities, I have found your page very useful in my development.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.
At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. The title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A link to the book chapter is provided but it is broken
Image sources are communicated, but some links are broken and the copyright licenses aren't acknowledged. The use of at least some of these presentation has probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission.
A copyright license for the presentation is provided
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
I don't think that Maslow's hierarchy of needs and Alderfer's ERG model provide fundamentally different explanations of task initiation, so combine and summarise these sections
The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory
Overall, the quality of written expression is below professional standard. UC Study Skills assistance is recommended to help improve writing skills
Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences
"People" is often a better term than "individuals"
Layout
Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
Grammar
The grammar for many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance.
Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')
Spelling can be improved (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.
APA style
Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, write in your own words
Figures
Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text
Figure captions use the correct format
Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation)
Overall, the use of learning features is excellent
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Excellent use of image(s)
Excellent use of table(s)
Very good use of feature box(es)
No use of quiz(zes)
Excellent use of case studies or examples
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section