Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Sexual harassment at work motivation

References

Hey, you probably want to check your formatting on your reference list!

Goodluck :) U3025906 (discuss • contribs) 09:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Great topic!

Very interesting topic and I love your dot points you have. Will be really interested into seeing whether sexual harassment training actually works or whether training on confidence in masculinity/personal development is actually required. Would be interested to see what sexual harassment female to male or same genders would look like and how that would effect power dynamics --GeorgiaFairweather (discuss • contribs) 11:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title and sub-title have been corrected - please get in touch if you'd like to discuss a change of topic User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence. To add a direct link see: Making and summarising social contributions. Headings Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure The headings could be improved by being more directly related to the topic (i.e., the sub-title question) Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Overview - Consider adding: an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered an image an example or case study There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory; make sure to cover both, as well as applications/implications Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Consider including more examples/case studies Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed Figure A figure is presented Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text References Good For APA referencing style, check and correct: include author initials capitalisation italicisation Resources See also Move this link to external links Link to relevant book chapters Link to relevant Wikipedia pages External links None

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hey there,

Looks like you have a nice lay out! I am looking forward to reading your chapter once its complete. I was doing some research on this and I found some sources that specifically linked race to sexual harassment in the workplace (mainly in America) but I thought that this might be a beneficial point for you to look at. Racially motivated sexual harassment is huge around the world and it definitely acts as a motivator. Here is one source to get your started if you would like to take this on board :): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gwao.12394?casa_token=n18pOwiBmxsAAAAA:VUTvxqR4mpWwZKOgM4fF-Kgx43Dh5IYw55GBzkH0qBUR0kgwROPyGsLXKk8DYZ0VTOCKeyqkiG_1urg1AA U3210431 (discuss • contribs) 10:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback

Hey there, great job on your book chapter. one suggestion i would like to make is in regards to your reference list - it is important to have this APA therefore this requires proper intent, italicts ect. i really encourage you to just have a look back and edit the template accordingly

Tips:

1. To make a sentence italic please include two dashes at the start and end of your section. for example: ''Jornal of Pyschology, #''(#).
2. leave one space in between each of the references so they appear orderly
3. make sure they are all in alphabetical order
4. correct capitalisation throughout

U3216563 (discuss • contribs) 06:32, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation It is unclear why is SH so narrowly described here as hetero from male to female? What about SH between other parties? This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A context for the topic is established Consider emphasising focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research The presentation includes citations to support claims The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages Audio The audio is easy to follow The presentation makes good use of narrated audio Audio communication is clear and well paced Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The presentation is reasonably smooth lacks the polish that comes with practice Audio recording quality was good Video Overall, visual display quality is basic Consider using sentence casing rather than all capitals The presentation makes basic use of text-based slides, plus webcam The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The screen resolution appears to be low The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is basically produced using simple tools Meta-data The correct chapter title and sub-title are missing from the name of the presentation — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A written description of the presentation is not provided A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and research to help address a real-world phenomenon or problem. The main area for potential improvement is incorporation of a more detailed review of relevant research Over the maximum word count. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Overview Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or example and/or using an image Very good focus question(s) Ideally, provide open-ended, rather than closed-ended focus questions Theory – Breadth An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Theory – Depth Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research – Key findings Basic review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Basic integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised Clear take-home message(s) Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good Some paragraphs are overly long. Communicate one key idea per paragraph in three to five sentences. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.[2] Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Check and make correct use of commas Use serial commas[3] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min) Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[4] Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard APA style Direct quotes need sources and page numbers – even better, write in your own words Figures Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text Use this format for figure captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: A full stop is needed after "et al" (i.e., "et al.") because it is an abbreviation of et alii. Multiple citations in parentheses should be separated by a semicolon References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[5] Check and correct use of italicisation Written expression – Learning features Basic use of learning features Good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s) No use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) Basic use of quiz(zes) Basic use of case studies or examples No use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Move external links to the external link section Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Rename links per Tutorial 02 Use sentence casing Include sources in parentheses Social contribution ~3 logged, useful, moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence ~2 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:32, 21 November 2022 (UTC)