Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Retrospective regret

Resources

Hi, It looks like you have got a great outline. There are some other researchers who have studied regret and their work might be useful for this chapter. Below are the references.

Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty. The Economic Journal (London), 92(368), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232669

Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(5), 961–981. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.5.961

Price, B. (2017). A theory of regret. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822372394

Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., Manstead, A. S. R., & van der Pligt, J. (1998). The experience of regret and disappointment. Cognition and Emotion, 12(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379727

Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., Manstead, A. S. R., & van der Pligt, J. (2000). On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402781 U3216256 (discuss • contribs) 02:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted The capitalisation of the title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. Headings Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure Consider providing more descriptive headings Key points Key points are well developed for most sections, with relevant citations No development of key points for the Overview and Conclusion Promising balance of theory and research Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Consider including more examples/case studies Figure A relevant figure is presented Caption should include Figure X. ... Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text Consider right-aligning the image which will allow the main text to flow around References Very good For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Appropriate selection Use internal linking style (see Tutorial 02) Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02) External links Very good Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and incorrect sub-title is displayed. Correct the sub-title. Also narrate to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Consider creating an engaging introduction to hook audience interest (e.g., the example at ~2:40 mins would be great) Establish a context for the topic (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content The concept of RR is clearly explained, along with its motivational role (target topic) The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basis use of relevant psychological research The presentation includes citations to support claims The presentation makes good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion A verbal conclusion is provided The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages Audio The audio is easy to follow The presentation makes good use of narrated audio Audio communication is clear and well paced Good intonation The narration is reasonably well practiced Audio recording quality was very good Video Overall, visual display quality is very good To follow APA style, use alphabetical order for multiple citations and use et al. for citations with 3 or more authors The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is provided A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:50, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a good chapter that makes very good use of psychological theory and research to help address a real-world phenomenon or problem Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Basic Overview Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest Clear focus question(s). Theory – Breadth An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Build more strongly on other regret-related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Regret) Theory – Depth Very good depth is provided about the selected theory(ies) Tables and/or lists could be used more effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information Basic use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts More examples could be useful to illustrate key concepts Research – Key findings Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are referenced Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated Conclusion Key points are well summarised Add practical, take-home message(s) Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is reasonably good Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences The chapter could be improved by developing some of the bullet-points into full paragraph format "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Layout Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Grammar Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[1] Use serial commas[2] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min) Spelling Spelling can be improved (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. APA style Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Figures Figures are very well captioned Figure captions should use this format: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) Multiple citations in parentheses should be listed in alphabetical order by first author surname References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of italicisation Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is insufficient No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s) No use of table(s) Basic/No use of feature box(es) No use of case studies or examples Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use bullet points per Tutorial 02 Also include links to related Wikipedia articles Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Use bullet-points per Tutorial 02 Social contribution ~1 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)