Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/Whereas an observer has nothing to do with it!

WikiJournal Preprints
Open access • Publication charge free • Public peer review

Submit

Authors

Reviewers

Editors

About

Journals

Journals

WikiJournal of Medicine

WikiJournal of Science

WikiJournal of Humanities

WikiJournal of PPB

WikiJournal Preprints

More resources

More resources

Articles in review

---

Editorial guidelines
Ethics statement
Bylaws
Indexing
Financials and reports
1-year/3-year plan
Proposed platform
Meeting minutes
Calendar

---

Contact

WikiJournal User Group is a publishing group of open-access, free-to-publish, Wikipedia-integrated academic journals. <seo title=" Wikiversity Journal User Group, WikiJournal Free to publish, Open access, Open-access, Non-profit, online journal, Public peer review "/>

<meta name='citation_doi' value=>

This article has been declined for publication by the WikiJournal of Science.

It is archived here as a record. Discussion can be viewed below.

First submitted: 11 Mar 2021
Declined: 14 Mar 2021
Article text

---

QID: Q105903815

---

Suggested (provisional) preprint citation format:
Emir Ashursky. "Whereas an observer has nothing to do with it!". WikiJournal Preprints. Wikidata Q105903815. 

License: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited.

Editors:

Reviewers: (comments)

---

Article information

Author: Emir E. Ashursky

See author information ▼

This article has been declined for publication by the WikiJournal of Science.

It is archived here as a record. Discussion can be viewed below.

Editorial comment

Comments by Thomas Shafee ,
These editorial comments were submitted on 14 Mar 2021, and refer to this previous version of the article

Having discussed with with editorial board, we have decided to decline this submission as a desk rejection. The article reads as an opinion piece that doesn't sufficiently represent the current state of science in the chosen sub-field, present its points sufficiently coherently, or properly reference information. It therefore doesn't meet the threshold of merit necessary for sending out for peer review.