Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/Specialty-Specific Gynecology Operative Units Promote Cost-Effectiveness

WikiJournal Preprints
Open access • Publication charge free • Public peer review

Submit

Authors

Reviewers

Editors

About

Journals

Journals

WikiJournal of Medicine

WikiJournal of Science

WikiJournal of Humanities

WikiJournal of PPB

WikiJournal Preprints

More resources

More resources

Articles in review

---

Editorial guidelines
Ethics statement
Bylaws
Indexing
Financials and reports
1-year/3-year plan
Proposed platform
Meeting minutes
Calendar

---

Contact

WikiJournal User Group is a publishing group of open-access, free-to-publish, Wikipedia-integrated academic journals. <seo title=" Wikiversity Journal User Group, WikiJournal Free to publish, Open access, Open-access, Non-profit, online journal, Public peer review "/>

<meta name='citation_doi' value=>

This article is an unpublished pre-print undergoing public peer review organised by the WikiJournal of Medicine.

You can follow its progress through the peer review process at this tracking page.

First submitted: 6 Dec 2020
Article text

---

QID: Q103896036

---

Suggested (provisional) preprint citation format:
Erica Robinson; Lara F. Bratcher Harvey; Elizabeth Alabi; Amanda Yunker. "Specialty-Specific Gynecology Operative Units Promote Cost-Effectiveness". WikiJournal Preprints. Wikidata Q103896036. 

License: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited.

Editors:

Thomas Shafee contact

Reviewers: (comments)

---

Article information

Authors: Erica F. Robinson  , Lara F. B. Harvey  , Elizabeth Alabi, Amanda C. Yunker

See author information ▼

This is the pre-publication public peer review for the article Specialty-Specific Gynecology Operative Units Promote Cost-Effectiveness

• Check for potential plagiarism (instructions for editors)
• Add a pre-publication peer review (instructions for reviewers)
• Update wikidata if article accepted or update wikidata if declined (instructions for editors)

Plagiarism check

Pass. Report from WMF copyvios tool indicates fully oringial content. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 01:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Initial editorial comments

Comments by Thomas Shafee ,


Discussion within the editorial board noted a few points that would be good to address before we send this out for peer review:

• Abstract: it would be useful to include the full names of the abbreviations CPT and PACU.
• Methods: It would be useful to note your search terms and strategy in the methods section used to identify the presence or absence of similar evaluations (relating to "To our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of specialty specific teams in the gynecologic literature").
• Discussion: It would be worth while referencing how this fits into the broader literature on the topic
• Additional info: Could you also include a funding statement (or 'no funding' if applicable).

Response

Thank you for your comments, and your points have been addressed

Comments by Thomas Shafee ,


Re: methods point above, it would still be valuable to confirm the exact search terms used. This would make clear how comprehensive/appropriate the literature search was to support the claim.

Note: The comment above relates to these changes. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 07:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Editorial note

Contacted handling editor about lack of reviews