This textbook chapter has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see what editing changes I have made whilst reading through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below or continuing to improve the chapter if you wish. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.
Overall, this was a very well constructed textbook chapter, congratulations. The theoretical aspects, in particular, were excellent, with broad, relevant, indepth coverage. Research aspects were less strong, but nevertheless still good. The presentation was excellent - the chapter was alive and interesting, with examples, captioned images, and rich learning activities. Written expression was generally good, but note below several minor suggestions for improvement.
The opening case study was engaging and clearly illustrated the two styles. However, be careful of falling into typing people as one or the other, when mostly optimisim-pessimism is conceptualised in psychology as a continuum.
Some sections described theory without necessarily referring to relevant research.
When describing important research findings, try to indicate the size of effects rather than simply whether or not there was an effect or relationship. e.g., "Pessimistic thinking is also highly correlated with depression" - how correlated?
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Use some more of the introduction to highlight the key purposes of this presentation and to establish why this is an important topic - what will a viewer get out of it if they keep watching?
Clear voice, well paced
Excellent animation of bullet-points
Emphasis was on theory; there wasn't much in the way of research