Talk:Motivation and emotion/Textbook/Motivation/Adultery

Chapter feedback

This textbook chapter has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see what editing changes I have made whilst reading through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below or continuing to improve the chapter if you wish. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall Overall, this is a solid DI-level chapter. The chapter is well structured and delivers on what it set out to do. There could have been more explored about sexual motivation (or at least linking to related textbook chapters regarding specific points of relevance). However, the focus on considering predictors of adultery was excellent particularly as you used this to describe and discuss related research findings. The chapter was well written, with several useful additional learning features. Theory Research Written expression Written expression The chapter could have benefited from developing clear focus questions. Getting comments on a chapter plan and/or chapter draft could have helped with this aspect. Learning features Excellent quiz and glossary Images were relevant, but they were not all captioned. More wiki-links could be added - see my editing for examples Spelling, grammar and proofreading Use Australian spelling e.g., hypothesize -> hypothesise APA style Do not cite the year for subsequent citations within a paragraph e.g., Smith (2010) but after that in the same paragraph only refer to Smith. When there are three or more authors, subsequent citations should use et al. e.g., Smith, Bush and Western (2001) and then in the next paragraph cite Smith et al. (2001).

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overview Overall, this was an effective and interesting narrated slide/bullet-point presentation, with well selected accompanying images. Audio was a bit quiet. Audio was clear (with the volume up), but sounded a little warped/out? Good intonation - you have an easy and interesting voice to follow. Use larger font. I liked the interactivity (e.g., suggesting hitting pause to think). I particularly liked the structuring around clear focus questions - well done. Ask a question, then "To put it simply, yes" was excellent, clear, down to earth communication. Well selected content (didn't try to cover everything, but rather to focus on well selected key points) Images attributions? Copyright license provided Content Conclusion Audio Video Meta-data Licensing

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)