Latest comment: 2 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section
Consider adapting the scenario to refer to future transcendental time perspective; or at least tailor towards how this perspective may affect the person's present emotion and motivation
Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/question i.e., make this section more user-friendly and move detail into subsequent sections.
Focus questions are basic. They are quite general. As a better understanding of the topic develops, make these more specific.
Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
Avoid providing too much background information (e.g., about time perspective). Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title (i.e., focus on transcendental time perspective.
It may be necessary to search beyond just "transcendental" to include synonymous terms
Promising balance of theory and research. Ideally, also include more examples.
Conclusion (the most important section):
Well developed
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.