Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Motivation in retirement

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Basic, 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections 3. Overview A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned Description of the problem/topic should be brief and evocative. Keep this section user-friendly. Move detail into subsequent section. Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section 4. Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed 5. Figure A relevant figure is presented and captioned Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style 6. Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Consider including quiz question(s), table(s) etc. 7. References Very good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? For APA referencing style, check and correct: alphabetical order capitalisation italicisation 8. Resources See also Not developed External links Not developed 9. User page Created – minimal, but sufficient Very brief description about self – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with indirect link(s) to evidence The three types of contribution are making: direct improvements to other book chapters (past or current) comments on chapters (past or current) posts about the unit or project on other platforms If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi U3243172. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Also note to use default heading styles (e.g., remove bold) -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a good to very good chapter. It makes excellent use of psychological theory and basic use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Reasonably good Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon Provide focus questions in a feature box to help guide the reader and structure the chapter Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds on one previous, related chapter and/or Wikipedia article Build more strongly on related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Excellent depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Use tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Basic review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any more details about systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Basic integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Layout Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional italics and/or bold) See earlier comments about heading casing Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Figures Briefly captioned; provide more detail to help connect the figure to the text Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.). To improve: References use basic APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[1] Check and correct use of italicisation Move non-peer reviewed links into the External links section Learning features Basic use of learning features One use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. Basic use of image(s) Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use bullet points per Tutorial 02 Rename links per Tutorial 02 Use internal linking style per Tutorial 02 Use alphabetical order No use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~2 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Detailed example Detailed example This is the template syntax with some prefilled comments:

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation Overview The opening slide conveys the purpose of the presentation The title and sub-title are displayed and somewhat narrated The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A basic context for the presentation is established Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses/somewhat addresses/does not adequately address the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes basic use of citations to support claims The presentation makes no use of examples The presentation provides practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion narration provides very good take-home message(s); also summarise messages visually Audio The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Basic intonation Consider using greater intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed Anatomy or autonomy? Audio recording quality was excellent Recording volume was low Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is reasonably good/basic The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The presentation could be strengthened by including more text (e.g., take-home messages) The visual communication is supplemented in a reasonably good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is reasonably well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The video title does not match the chapter title and sub-title. This would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent. Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)