Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Justice motivation

Articles that might be helpful.

Hey @Emeweme! I found an article on how different justice motivations might impact moral judgements and/or conflict. Thought you might find it helpful! See here: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1669536. D. E. Finlay (discuss • contribs) 04:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

My suggestions

Hi @Emeweme! Check out this motivation and emotion book chapter from a previous year. It might be helpful. See here: Motivation and emotion/Book/2019/Rewards, punishments, and social cooperation. MoniqqueK (discuss • contribs) 04:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed) 2. Headings Promising 3-level heading structure – could benefit from simplifying to a 2-level structure further development by expanding the structure Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Good balance of theory and research Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year) Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure A figure is presented and captioned Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style Consider decreasing image size to make it less dominant in relation to the text (fixed) 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Excellent use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Very good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: use of "and" vs. "&" capitalisation italicisation page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) 8. Resources See also Add links to the most relevant Wikiversity book chapters and Wikipedia pages Move external links to the external links section Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order External links Move the external links from see also to here 9. User page Created – minimal, but sufficient Very brief description about self – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence Use a numbered list

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Suggestions for direction

Hey @Emeweme! I had a read through your document and noticed that you didn't discuss the moderating role of moral outrage can have on justice motivations. I've linked a couple of articles here and here that might be helpful. All the best with your chapter! --DFaol (discuss • contribs) 04:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@DFaol thank you very much for the suggestions! Emeweme (discuss • contribs) 04:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an insufficient presentation mainly because it lacks sufficient synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic The presentation is under the maximum time limit (3 mins). Room for further development. Overview The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a very good way Engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is established through an example Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation somewhat addresses the topic The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes insufficient/no use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes insufficient/no use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of examples The presentation provides good practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides insufficient summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic Audio The audio is easy to follow The presentation makes reasonably good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Basic intonation The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was excellent The narrated content lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic Video Overall, visual display quality is basic The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The presentation could be strengthened by including more text (e.g., take-home messages) The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is basically produced using simple tools The visual content lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic Meta-data The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is not clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Reasonably good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon The focus questions are clear and relevant Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on other chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Key citations are well used Consider using more examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Good integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Conclusion Very good summary and conclusion Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Layout Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[1] Spelling Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. APA style Express numbers < 10 using words (e.g., two) and >= 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 99) Citations use basic APA style (7th ed.). To improve: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses References use very good APA style: Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Reasonably good use of learning features Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of figure(s) No use of table(s) Reasonably good use of feature box(es) Basic use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Also include links to related book chapters Reasonably good use of external links in the "External links" section Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order Include sources in parentheses after the link Social contribution ~6 logged, useful, mostly minor to moderate contributions with some direct and some indirect links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)