Latest comment: 6 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Very good - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
Focus questions could be improved by:
Unpacking the first question - this is the core topic
The second question is less relevant (not part of the topic) - there are other chapters that could be linked to address this question in-depth, although a brief explanation would be useful
The third question is a bit vague/general - make sure the focus questions directly relate to the sub-title for the chapter
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.