Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Intrinsic motivation and creativity

Heading casing

edit
 
Hi Trodrickk. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:31, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Topic development feedback

edit

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

 
  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for larger section(s)
  3. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. Very good - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
  2. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  3. Focus questions could be improved by:
    1. Unpacking the first question - this is the core topic
    2. The second question is less relevant (not part of the topic) - there are other chapters that could be linked to address this question in-depth, although a brief explanation would be useful
    3. The third question is a bit vague/general - make sure the focus questions directly relate to the sub-title for the chapter
  1. Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Good balance of theory and research
  3. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
  1. Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
  1. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. Very good
  2. Good to see identification of a relevant meta-analysis
  3. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
  1. See also
    1. Not developed
  2. External links
    1. Not developed
  3. I get the sense that you may have not have completed Tutorial 2
  1. Good
  2. Use headings as shown in Tutorial 02
  3. Excellent description about self provided
  4. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  5. Link provided to book chapter
  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:31, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Intrinsic motivation and creativity" page.