Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Habit stacking

Sub-heading restructuring

Hey @U3228753: I have noticed that in your last heading, you have provided only one subheading (Examples of habit stacking), consider reformatting this to a paragraph and making the text bold, or add some more subheadings, as in the rubric it says 2+ subheadings if you are to use them (Link to the rubric 'here').

Initial suggestions

@U3228753: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Habit
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Productivity
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:59, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Figure referencing

Just so you know, I took the liberty of editing one of your dot points where you referred to your 1st figure by "fig 1". According to the marking criteria we should refer to the figure in this way "see Figure 1". Might be a more formal way to refer to figures! Feel free to revert it if you think it's fine. But besides from that one small thing, I think your chapter is so far very interesting! I look forward to seeing it develop. Seth Guglielmin (discuss • contribs) 06:49, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for catching that! I will be sure to correctly reference my figures in the future. U3228753 (discuss • contribs) 02:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title is correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Where there is a lack of academic research/evidence about HS, point this out There seems to be excellent good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed 5. Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited Note that formatting of figure citations can be improved to be APA style 6. Learning feature Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc. 7. References Excellent 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent Use sentence casing 9. User page Used effectively Brief description about self provided – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence Also try commenting on a chapter talk page and posting and linking to an external discussion

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Looking great!

Hi!

I think your chapter looks fantastic and covers the criteria well. I would suggest adding a few more links to terms you have referenced throughout the chapter to introduce key ideas (like the theories underpinning forming habits) to your chapter early on.

Visually it looks great!

Dani Danikollas (discuss • contribs) 04:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Feedback

Hi,

Your chapter is looking great and I can see you have put a lot of work into it! I have added a couple of clarification templates and comments throughout for your consideration. Perhaps you could also consider adding a couple more internal links throughout the chapter. Hope this helps :) U3216883 (discuss • contribs) 03:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Clear focus questions Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on related chapters and Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Excellent use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Very good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident Integration Very good integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent APA style Use serial commas[1]. Video (1 min) Express numbers < 10 using words (e.g., two) and >= 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 99) Figures Very well well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Tables Table captions use APA style or wiki style Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Citations use excellent APA style (7th ed.) References use very good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Remove publisher location Learning features Excellent use of learning features Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Excellent use of image(s) Excellent use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of case studies or examples Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section Use sentence casing Social contribution ~14 logged, useful, mostly moderate social contributions with mostly direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed (font could be larger) — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Also consider narrating. Engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes excellent use of citations to support claims The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples The presentation provides practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides an excellent summary and take-home message(s) Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/poor The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is effectively supplemented by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is very well produced The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. Excellent use of time codes An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated in the description but not the meta-data

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)