Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
At least three different types of contributions with mostly direct link(s) to evidence
To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity comments: view the talk page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey @MoniqqueK! I noticed that you're leaning on a significant amount of neurological mechanisms in your discussion of habit formation. I was wondering if it would be worth discussing the memory centres of the brain alongside the executive function centres. Baladron and Hamker, 2020, (see here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ejn.14730) explored the relationship between habit and hippocampal structures in rats. --DFaol (discuss • contribs) 03:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, super interesting chapter so far! I was just thinking James Clears book Atomic Habits explains habit formation and environmental cues super well in a pop-psychology/ lay term way. Even though it's mostly about habit stacking, it might be a beneficial external source for explaining the basics to people. If you were interested in including it as a source for readers heres a link to James website: https://jamesclear.com/atomic-habitsU3239091 (discuss • contribs) 23:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
hey, you've done a great job writing the chapter clearly, and I really appreciate the link you've made between environmental cues and building positive habits. One suggestion to consider is expanding on how changing/ removing environmental cues can help break unhealthy habits. This could add to the understanding of how habits are formed and disrupted great work so far :) U3236683 (discuss • contribs) 20:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
An excellent written description of the presentation is provided
Latest comment: 7 hours ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
I suspect that some of this chapter is based on unacknowledged use of genAI output; if so, it violates academic integrity principles
Good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims
In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
Bullet points are overused. Develop more of the bullet point statements into full sentences and paragraphs.
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Layout
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
Not all sub-headings are implemented using wiki-style headings, so they don't appear in the table of contents
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags)
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
Reasonably good use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of figure(s)
No use of table(s)
Reasonably good use of feature box(es)
Very good use of scenarios, case studies, or examples
Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than as a set of questions at the end
Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Use alphabetical order
Basic use of external links in the "External links" section