Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure
Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
Definition(s) tend to be pedestrian headings. Incorporate definitional material into the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information.
Case study doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed case study within relevant sections
Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections
Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Latest comment: 12 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers