Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Very brief description about self – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making posts about the unit or project on other platforms such as the UCLearn discussion forum or on X using the #emot24
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi!
I have read over your draft and I think it looks really promising! Your tables and figures are really informative and help the chapter flow.
Here are some suggestions for improvement:
After running your chapter through the readability test you scored 48.7 and should be aiming for a score of 50. To improve your score I would suggest trying to shorten some of your paragraphs by either spliting them into two seperate paragraphs or trying to cut them down to around 5 sentences (as per the rubric suggestions). I also think when you build out the rest of your dot points it will help improve the score.
You will also need to add in more referneces to indicate that you have done extensive reading (the assessment instructions suggests a dozen references at least) and to prove your information is factual as well as avoiding plagurism.
Finally, I can see you have two quiz questions you are yet to update from the template, if you want to break up your writing a little bit more I would suggest adding some more quiz questions to the end of each section to helpo with the flow of information. Alternatively, a case study or feature box could also work to do this.
I have also made a few edits in your reference list to the casing of the titles of a few references to align with APA formatting.
Best of luck with the rest of the assignment! I am excited to see how your work progresses!
Latest comment: 15 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed. Also narrate or paraphrase the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
A basic context for the presentation is established
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.