Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Rumesa,
I love the topic you have chosen and how you have gone in such detail about the application of signature strengths.
I do have a recommendation - to shorten the amount of focus questions you have.
Since you only have 3 main headings, there shouldn't be a need to add more than 3/4 focus questions.
Perhaps you can remove the focus questions that are targeting the various applications of signature strength and replace it with one generic focus question such as: What are some applications of signature strength?
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Is some of this genAI content (e.g., Conclusion)? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries otherwise it violates academic integrity.
Conclusion (the most important section):
Underway
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I really enjoyed reading this book chapter! Thank you for all the effort that was put into it. In my opinion, I feel like additional interactive mechanisms (e.g., quizzes, case studies, figures) would have helped to maintain the reader's interest.
I have also made some changes to your reference list, I hope you don't mind! The main errors are the unnecessarily capitalised words. Remember to only capitalise the first word, the first word after a colon, initials or acrynoms :).
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
Some sentences are overly long. Strive for the simplest expression. Consider splitting longer sentences into two shorter sentences.
Some sentences could be explained more clearly (e.g., see the [explain?] and [improve clarity] tags)
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159)
Figures
Figures are well captioned
Figure 2 has been removed for copyright violation; renumber
Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example:
If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either:
Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Good use of feature box(es)
Very good use of case studies or examples
Very good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than as a set of questions at the end
Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Reasonably good use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
It could be improved by providing a cogent synthesis of the best research about signature strengths and more examples. It could also be improved by providing more accurate information about the copyright licenses for images.
An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter.
Engaging introduction to hook audience interest
A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
Add space between title and sub-title
A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
Links to and from the book chapter are provided
An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features