Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Sammy! I thought I would leave a note here to let you know of the edits I made to your page for my social contribution. The main thing I did was just a few grammatical/spelling edits, and I also added a wikilink to the article on Psilocybe subaeruginosa. Check out the changes on the history page here. I also suggest that you remove the link to your user page, and the social contributions section (as this should be on your user page itself), based on what James has told us so far in lectures/tutorials. I really enjoyed what you've written so far, and I'm definitely keen to see how this topic turns out as it's very interesting! --U3213682 (discuss • contribs) 05:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Keep the initial sections about psilocybin assisted therapy and anxiety as separate sections brief. The main relevant material to address the sub-title will be theory and research about how and why psilocybin assisted therapy may be able to help people who have problems with anxiety. Be wary of addressing too much general or related material. Instead, mention briefly with relevant links to more info. In this respect, the key sections will be 4 and 5.
Well developed 2-level heading structure, but not point above; may wish to abbreviate/rationalise non-core sections
Reduce length of opening paragraph; create a more inviting start (e.g., be presenting a scenario/case study)
Write for an international audience (Australians are only .3% of world population!)
There seem to be two different sets of focus questions - integrate. The most relevant question is "How is psilocybin used a treatment for anxiety?". Other questions are tangential, so don't make them focus questions. Other relevant questions might be around the mechanisms of action, the evidence about efficacy etc.
The most relevant external resources are likely to be about psilocybin and treatment of anxiety rather than being more generally about psilocybin etc.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory
Perhaps there is room to explore how psilocybin therapy is specifically tailored to assist with anxiety - i.e., what is unique about using psilocybin to help deal with anxiety compared to dealing with other issues? Some of this is covered, but could go further (with less general psilocybin assisted therapy emphasis).
Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Avoid overly emotive language in science-based communication
Layout
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
Abbreviations are probably overused; keep to a minimum
Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour)
APA style
Write numbers under 10 using words (e.g., five). Express numbers 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 10).
Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, write in your own words
Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159)
Figures
Figures are very well captioned
Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
Citations use almost correct APA style
Check: List multiple citations in alphabetical order by first author surname
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Excellent use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Basic use of feature box(es)
Good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Very good use of case studies or examples
Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
Audio communication is well paced
Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
The narration is well practiced and/or performed
Audio recording quality was excellent
The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content) but could be improved by incorporating more explicit synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic
The presentation makes creative use of stock video and images
The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
The presentation is very well produced
The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content) but could be improved by synthesising the best psychological research about this topic
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A rich written description of the presentation is provided