Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Two of three different types of contributions with some direct link(s) and some indirect link(s) to evidence
Recommend more engagement with helping improve other book chapters
If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey! I would love to see a table to display the pros and cons of the placebo effect before diving into peer reviewed research! It would make it super clear while also engaging to break up the text. Mia Pearse (discuss • contribs) 05:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Move links to non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section
Reasonably good use of image(s)
Very basic use of table(s)
Basic use of feature box(es)
Basic use of case studies or examples
Very basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Insufficient use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Links lack sufficient relevance to the topic.
Good use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
The presentation somewhat addresses the topic
Why does this presentation focus on the PE and pain? (This is not specified in the title/sub-title)
An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
The selection of content is somewhat because it doesn't adequately use the most relevant psychological theory and/or research to address the topic - i.e., placebo effect and emotion
The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological theory
The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research
The presentation includes citations to support claims
The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies
The audience is international (Australians are only .3% of world population)
A Conclusion slide is presented with basic take-home message(s)
Add a title to the Conclusion slide
What are the practical take-home message(s) that we can use to help improve our everyday lives based on the best available psychological theory and research about this topic?
The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
Links to and from the book chapter are provided
An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features