Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Learning motivation and chatbots

Initial suggestions

edit

@Ashhstarr: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

  • When I was a kid, this helped me learn maths: Little Professor
  • This is a cutting edge topic, and may be necessarily somewhat exploratory, but there is a lot of research work going on as we speak
  • Consider perhaps possible pros and cons of chatbots for learning motivation (could be a table)
  • Probably the best known current educational chatbot is through Khan Academy - that perhaps could make a useful case study
  • Consider using genAI to help guide your thinking about this topic
  • Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand? What is the main research in this area?

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Feedback and suggestions

edit

Hello! I really enjoyed reading your chapter, I think you found some really interesting examples about the positive effects of AI in education. I have some suggestions that I think may really strengthen your piece:

I think that incorporating more peer reviewed sources whenever you state "research/ studies say..". This adjustment will bring a lot of value to an already great piece. I have included some suggestions for where you can include the references.
There are also some areas of the text that could use further explanation such as in the motivated learning section.

Otherwise, such a well done job! Goodluck with your assignment :)

--Dnamynts (discusscontribs) 16:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I came across this interesting article which may help you with your chapter

edit

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X23000073 Very interesting topic! --U3168525 (discusscontribs) 00:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thankyou so much! 106.69.211.68 (discuss) 03:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Khan Academy

edit

Suggested talk: How AI could save (not destroy) education -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thankyou!! 106.69.211.68 (discuss) 02:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I came across, The Impact of Chatbot-Based Learning on Students’ Learning Motivation and Performance ,which may help your chapter Sincerely Giovanni

Heading casing

edit
 
FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

edit

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

 
  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development
  1. Put the scenario at the start into a feature box with the image to help attract reader interest
  2. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
  3. Focus questions are probably overly complicated
  4. Avoid double-barrelled questions (e.g,. split into separate questions)
  5. I think the figure is a symbolic rather than technical representation
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Strive to identify the most recent relevant citations
  3. Promising balance of theory and research
  4. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Well developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. A relevant figure is presented
  2. See earlier comment about caption which could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text
  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of table(s)
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s) etc.
  1. Excellent
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
  1. Excellent
  1. Created – minimal, but sufficient
  2. Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback

edit

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

 

Overall

edit
  1. Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter. It makes good use of psychological theory but limited use of research to help address a real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand
  3. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
  1. Solid
  2. Briefly engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or scenario with an image in a feature box
  3. The scenario could be expanded
  4. Provides a reasonably good explanation of the problem or phenomenon
  5. Reasonable focus questions; could be more targetted to unpack the topic: "How can student motivation to learn be enhanced by using artificial intelligence chatbots?"
  1. A reasonably good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)
  3. Basic depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  4. Lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
  5. Some use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
  1. Basic review of relevant research
  2. Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Greater emphasis on effect sizes could be helpful.
  3. Lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
  4. Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  5. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. discussing the direction of relationships
    3. considering the strength of relationships
    4. acknowledging limitations
    5. pointing out critiques/counterarguments
    6. suggesting specific directions for future research
  6. Many claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
  1. Reasonably good integration between theory and research
  1. Reasonably good summary and conclusion
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is reasonably good
    2. There is no acknowledgement in the edit summary about use of AI content; using AI content without acknowledgement violates academic integrity
    3. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
  2. Layout
    1. Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
    2. Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
    3. See earlier comments about heading casing
  3. Grammar
    1. The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags)
  4. APA style
    1. Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.
    2. Figures
      1. Figures are well captioned
      2. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
    3. Tables
      1. Use APA style for captions. See example
      2. Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text
    4. Citations use correct APA style
    5. The reference is too short for professional coverage of this topic
    6. References use correct APA style
    7. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation[2]
      2. Check and correct use of italicisation
  1. Basic use of learning features
  2. Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Very good use of image(s)
  5. Basic use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
  8. Good use of case studies or examples
  9. Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  10. Basic use of external links in the "External links" section
  1. ~3 logged, minor social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

 

Overall

edit
  1. Overall, this is a basic presentation
  2. The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes
  1. An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter.
  2. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  3. A basic context for the topic is established
  4. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation somewhat addresses the topic
  3. The presentation argues that learning chatbots help to satisfy autonomy, competence, and relatedness
  4. The presentation also argues that learning chatbots provide positive reinforcement
  5. No research evidence is presented to support these claims; no examples are provided
  6. There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
  7. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory
  8. The presentation makes no explicit use of relevant psychological research
  9. The presentation includes some citations to support claims
  10. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies
  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with take-home message(s)
  2. The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit
  1. The audio gets off to a slow start (about 8 seconds in)
  2. The presentation makes good use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is well paced
  4. Audio recording quality was excellent
  5. The narrated content is partially matched to the target topic (see content)
  1. Overall, visual display quality is good
  2. The presentation makes effective/good/basic use of text and image based slides
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by images and/or diagrams
  5. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  6. The visual content is partially to the target topic (see content)
  1. The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. The title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A written description of the presentation is not provided
  3. A link to the book chapter is not provided
  4. A link from the book chapter is provided
  5. The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This introduces limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are not provided
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Template:Subt:Heading casingReply

Return to "Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Learning motivation and chatbots" page.