Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Köhler effect and motivation

Ringelman effect and social loafing

May also want to look into Ringelman Effect and Social Loafing. U3187226 (discuss • contribs) 02:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

This page was nominated for speedy delete

@U3170318 and Jtneill: I've been on Wikiversity many years but have only recently become active with cleanup (i.e. deleting). Somebody put this up for speedy delete, and this is the first time I encountered such a request on project like this. Please advise.

The quickest way to "advise" is to remove the {{hangon}} template and say (or do) no more.

--sincerely -- Guy vandegrift (discuss • contribs) 16:48, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks @Guy vandegrift: - I've moved this almost empty page from the 2020 sub-folder to the 2023 sub-folder, so hopefully it will be improved in the coming year. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:12, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Initial suggestions

@U3168525: Thanks for tackling this topic.

Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other social psychology chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work.
• What psychological theories can help to understand? What is the main research in this area?

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Overview Add a scenario in a feature box at the start to help catch reader interest. Consider adding an image to the case study to further help attract reader interest. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned May be overly detailed/ambitious - keep it brief Expand focus questions; focus on unpacking KE and motivation Key points Key points are well developed for each section, with some relevant citations Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed Figure Not included Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc. References Good Are there any systematic reviews about the KE? For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also OK Include source in brackets after link Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages Move youtube link to External links External links Not developed Remove link to author page (this is findable through the page history) User page Good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation The presentation is under the maximum time limit, so there was room for further development of the ideas Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed. Also narrate the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes little use of relevant psychological research Ideally, make more explicit use of research Include citations to support claims The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s) Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was excellent The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content) Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides Most of the font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The amount of text presented per slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a good way by images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content) Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A written description of the presentation is provided Links to and from the book chapter are provided An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Basic Engage reader interest by presenting a case study or scenario with an image in a feature box Explains the problem or phenomenon somewhat clearly Basic focus questions Theory A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds well on related Wikipedia articles Build more strongly on related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Use tables, figures, and/or lists are to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Consider using more examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are referenced Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Very good summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is reasonably good but there are several aspects which could be improved towards a professional standard Some paragraphs are overly long. Communicate one key idea per paragraph in three to five sentences. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Layout Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Spelling Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[2]. Video (1 min) Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Citations use correct APA style References use basic APA style: Check and correct use of italicisation Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Include hyperlinked dois Learning features Reasonably good use of learning features Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s) Image captions should use APA style No use of table(s) Very basic use of feature box(es) Reasonably good use of case studies or examples Reasonably good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than as a set of questions at the end Split see also section links into external links Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order Include sources in parentheses Move external links to the external links section Social contribution No logged social contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)