Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Narcissism and emotion

Video

Hello! I found this ted talk on narcissism and its discontents. This might be of interest to you. You should check it out. If you like the video you could also add it to your external links at the end of your book chapter. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHHWgG7dB6A and video is called: Narcissism and Its Discontents | Ramani Durvasula | TEDxSedona Hope this is useful for you. Thank you --U3202023 (discuss • contribs) 23:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Iv’e found an article which I thought might be useful for your book chapter. It discusses emotion regulation and refers to two types of narcissism :) - --TaraU3187760 (discuss • contribs) 10:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC) https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.519330/full

Hey there, I find narcissism such an interesting topic, looking forward to reading your completed chapter! Here's a really useful infographic I've found talking about the effects of parental narcissism on their children https://www.forensicpsychology.org/9Duffy2017poster.pdf --U3187208 (discuss • contribs) 01:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Social contributions

hi there! i cant wait to read more about narcissism when your chapter is complete! I was thinking more on what are some motivators involved in narcissisistic behaviours and found a really interesting study disucssing narcissism and status pursuit. here is the link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970445/

Good luck with your chapter! :) U3203008 (discuss • contribs)

Heading casing

Hi A Super Villain. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter that makes good use of psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and [/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2022%2FNarcissism_and_emotion&type=revision&diff=2446275&oldid=2446116 these copyedits]. Overview Solid Overview. Opening sentence: Narcissism (trait) is not the same as NPD. Distinguish. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon, but more in terms of N and not so much in terms of the relation with emotion. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest. Clear focus question(s). Theory – Breadth Relevant theory is reasonably well explained. Some of the language and conceptualisation of the phenomenon is overly simplistic (e.g., "Narcissists have no empathy"). It could be helpful to distinguish between a type (narcissist) vs. trait (narcissism) approach. The latter approach is arguably more useful. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory. Build more strongly on other narcissism-related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Narcissism). Theory – Depth Reasonable depth is provided about the selected theory(ies). Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts. More examples could be useful to illustrate key concepts. Research – Key findings Reasonably good review of relevant research. Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Research – Critical thinking Reasonably good critical thinking about research is evident. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims are referenced. Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags). Integration Discussion of theory and research is reasonably well integrated. Conclusion Key points are well summarised. Clear take-home message(s). Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking. Layout Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings. See earlier comments about heading casing. Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats').[1]. Use serial commas[2] – they are part of APA style and agenerally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min). Check and correct use of semi-colons (;) and colons (:). Abbreviations Check and correct grammatical formatting for abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e., et al., etc.). Proofreading More proofreading is needed to fix typos and bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard. Remove unnecessary capitalisation (e.g., Narcissism). Figures Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text. Figure captions should use this format: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation). Citations use correct APA style. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Check and correct use of italicisation Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is excellent/very good/good/basic/insufficient. One use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s). No use of table(s). Good use of feature box(es). Basic use of quiz(zes). Promising use of case studies or examples. Could be enhanced. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Basic use of external links in the "External links" section. Social contribution ~1 logged, useful, minor/moderate/major social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview An opening slide with the title is displayed. Also display and narrate the sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A context for the topic is established Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic, but is overly focused on NPD as opposed to narcissism as a personality trait (e.g., see narcissism (Wikipedia) The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes some implied use of relevant psychological research; ideally make more explicit use of research The presentation includes citations The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies Conclusion The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The audio is easy to follow Audio communication is well paced Very good intonation Audio recording quality was OK. audio Video Overall, visual display quality is good The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by images and/or diagrams The presentation is basically produced using simple tools Hide the audio icon Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources are communicated in a general way. Also provide links to each image and the license details. Ideally, provide clickable links to the original image sources (e.g., in the description) Use of at least one image has probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)