Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Hypomania and emotion

Suggestion

Hey Alec,

This topic will be incredibly interesting! To help you get a start on some research, I found a source that looks at the role of emotional dysregulation and Bipolar disorder (BD) with a specific focus on healthy populations with hypomanic personalities. Interestingly, the results suggested that the brain activity involved in a lack of emotional regulation, may present as a marker for the development of BD. Hope this helps you :)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032713003546?casa_token=MqJYWwEx1YAAAAAA:FybO7-EdiPapINzdlvx5VALza5_32k4P-ZJn2fAwSGUQ6K4_hTWlC9zhAT6m3oexhsy6HpymXgQ U3210431 (discuss • contribs) 01:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Textbook suggestion

Alec,

I'm eager to see what information you find on this topic and to see the final product of your chapter!

While I was looking for resources I could share with you to help you that you may have not found yourself, I stumbled across a textbook on bipolar disorder that could serve as a launchpad into a wide range of other references.

The textbook: Yatham, Lakshmi N.; Maj, Mario  (2010). Bipolar Disorder (Clinical and Neurobiological Foundations) || doi:10.1002/9780470661277 

I accessed the textbook for free through Sci-Hub but I believe a PDF can be borrowed through the library.

Good luck! :) Jdebear (discuss • contribs) 05:19, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution At least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic The section that is probably least relevant is for the theories at the end; to the extent that you think these are relevant, then look to embed their use into the other sections Key points Key points are well developed for each section, with some relevant citations Where there are sub-sections, provide at least 1 paragraph under the main heading before branching into the sub-sections Overview - Consider adding: an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered focus questions - I've given these a tweak - see what you think an image - maybe an alternative (simpler) image for the Overview? an example or case study Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Consider including more examples/case studies Conclusion (the most important section): Underway What might the take-home, practical messages be? In a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions? Figure A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned Cite each figure at least once in the main text Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view References Excellent Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Overview Well developed Overview. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest. Clear focus question(s). Theory – Breadth Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory. Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters). Theory – Depth Appropriate depth is provided about the selected theory(ies). Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts. More examples could be useful to illustrate key concepts. The Reeve (2018) textbook is overused as a citation – instead, utilise primary, peer-reviewed sources. Research – Key findings Relevant research is well reviewed. Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Research – Critical thinking Excellent critical thinking about research is evident. Claims are generally very well referenced. Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated. Conclusion Key points are well summarised. Clear take-home message(s). Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences. Some sentences are overly long; consider splitting them into shorter, separate sentences. "People" is often a better term than "individuals". Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent. Use serial commas[1] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. Here's an explanatory video (1 min). APA style Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159). Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10). Figures Figures are well used. Figures are well captioned. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style. Figure captions should use this format: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation). Citations use correct APA style. References use correct APA style. Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is very good. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Links to non-peer-reviewed sources should be moved to the external links section. Good use of image(s). No use of table(s). Very good use of feature box(es). Good use of quiz(zes). Good use of case studies or examples. Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Very good use of external links in the "External links" section. Social contribution ~30+ logged, useful to major social contributions with direct links to evidence. Thanks very much for your extensive contributions, particularly the image uploads. Note that the Christchurch before earthquake image orientations need rotation (can then be re-uploaded_.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and the sub-title is narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A context for the topic is established Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation is well structured The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research The presentation includes citations Include citations The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion slide is clear take-home message(s) Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is clear and well paced Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Good intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well polished Audio recording quality was very good Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter sub-title (question mark missing) but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. The title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. A link to the book chapter is provided but it is not clickable A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)