Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Fully functioning person

Resources for your 'Rogers' section

Hi, These sources might be useful for your section on Rogers and FFP.

Stephen, S., & Elliott, R. (2022). The Strathclyde Inventory: Development of a Brief Instrument for Assessing Outcome in Counseling According to Rogers’ Concept of the Fully Functioning Person. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 55(3), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2021.1955213

Proctor, C., Tweed, R., & Morris, D. (2016). The Rogerian Fully Functioning Person: A Positive Psychology Perspective. The Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(5), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167815605936

Renger, S., & Macaskill, A. (2021). Simplifying the definition of the fully functioning person for client use. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(4), 970–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12386

Rogers. C. R. (1963). The concept of the fully functioning person. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 1(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088567

U3216256 (discuss • contribs) 00:25, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi Sebastian Armstrong. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Comment on figure

Hi, i think you are on a very good track here, however, i think with your firgure it may be good to add a little description for what the figure is for :) U3216563 (discuss • contribs) 02:32, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence Use a numbered list Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic Consider adding a theory section early on to, perhaps after history, to explain the FFP theory The related theory section is useful if it fits, but it could be the first to go if you run into word count issues, and just provide links to these theories from the see also section Key points Key points are well developed for some sections, but missing for other sections For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Overview - Consider adding: an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered an image an example or case study Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Consider including more examples/case studies Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? In a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions? Figure Excellent – A relevant figure is presented Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text References OK Only cite sources that you've consulted Emphasise peer-reviewed academic work For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation Resources Good Use bullet-points Include source in brackets after link Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages External links OK Move Wikipedia links to see also Use bullet-points

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter that makes good use of psychological theory and some research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. A strength is the practical applicability; a limitation is the lack of drawing on research. It may have been useful to broaden the search in this respect, although appropriate criticisms are discussed. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Overview Reasonable Overview. Usually best to express in own words, rather than use direct quotes. Explains the problem or phenomenon. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest. Some focus question(s) are clear, others could be reworded. Theory – Breadth Relevant theory is well selected, described, and explained. Self-actualisation is mentioned a lot, but not linked directly to any relevant resource. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory. Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters). Historical material is well covered; but is the most recent relevant material also included? e.g., https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01706 Theory – Depth Excellent depth is provided about the selected theory(ies). Several useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts. Research – Key findings Basic overview of relevant research. A broader search could have been useful to identify the most relevant contemporary research. Research – Critical thinking Good critical thinking about research is evident. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are referenced. Integration Discussion of theory and research is reasonably well integrated. Conclusion Key points are well summarised. Consider reminding the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest. Clear take-home message(s). Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. "People" is often a better term than "individuals". Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Proofreading More proofreading is needed to fix typos. APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159). Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10). Figures Figures are well captioned. Figure captions use the correct format. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style. Citations use correct APA style. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Noticeable lack of peer-review journal articles. Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is very good. Good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Good use of image(s). No use of table(s). Good use of feature box(es). Very good use of reflection questions. Excellent use of case studies or examples. Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Include sources in parentheses. Basic use of external links in the "External links" section. Move Wikipedia links to See also. Social contribution ~6 logged, useful, moderate to major social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Also narrate the title and sub-title. This presentation has an engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the topic is established Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation is reasonably well structured The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research Consider including more citations to support claims The road metaphor works well, but the presentation could be improved by making more use of practical examples or case studies Conclusion The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The audio is easy to follow Audio communication is clear and well paced Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well polished Audio recording quality was excellent Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides, including a revealed graphical metaphor Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools Check grammar for "What is full functioning person:" Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated Ideally, provide clickable links to the original image sources (e.g., in the description) A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the meta-data

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)