Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
If adding the second or subsequent edit to a page, add direct links to evidence like this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Add your signature to comments on talk/discussion pages
Promising development of key points for some sections, with relevant citations
Write the chapter using 3rd person perspective, although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective
Overview - Consider adding:
focus questions (could replace the learning outcomes)
an image
an example or case study
Remove excessive use of italics, especially from the links
Multiple citations should be in alphabetical order (APA style)
Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year)
Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
Conclusion (the most important section):
hasn't been developed
what might the take-home, practical messages be?
in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?
This is generally well-written, but I recommend using the Studiosity service to help improve the quality of written expression because there are a lot of grammar and spelling errors.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, this is a really interesting book chapter, I always wonder about the root of motivation people have to become a health professional. As James has already mentioned watch out for the casing, in your titles. I found this journal article 'Wounded Healer: Psychotherapist Grief Over a Client's Death' DOI: 10.1037/A0023788. I think you could incorporate this article really well into your chapter as a case study. The article goes into topics like countertransference, ethics and the mental wellbeing of the Psychotherapist. Best of luck! --U3217975 (discuss • contribs) 08:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello, very unique topic and has a lot of potential in a modern setting if presented right. I would suggest adding features like case studies and reflective questions to help those reading this article and more pictures wouldn't/t hurt either. - u3203031
Hi,
I jumped in and corrected a typo in your work, but I also noticed some grammar errors. I would suggest copying it to a word document and sending it to Studiosity through Canvas. They currently have a 4-6 hour turn around, so you'll get it back in time to incorporate changes. Areas to focus on would be comma use for introductory clauses. this seemed to be happening throughout and i would suggest doing an in-depth proof read before submission tomorrow.
I would also suggest checking if you have used the best words throughout your work. For example, is anticipation the best word in this sentence?
"Have you ever wondered why you have anticipation for a career in psychotherapy"
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Display and narrate the correct title and sub-title to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter.
Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest.
Establish a context for the topic, to help the viewer understand.
Briefly explain why this topic is important.
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio.
Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
Good intonation enhances listener interest and engagement.
Audio recording quality was OK. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality.
Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., white noise). Consider using an external microphone.
The correct chapter title and sub-title are missing from the name of the presentation — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A written description of the presentation is provided.
Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Either provide details about the image sources and their copyright licenses in the presentation description or remove the presentation.
A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent.
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes.
No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
Basic use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding more in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of image(s).
No use of table(s).
Basic use of feature box(es).
No use of quiz(zes).
Very good use of case studies or examples.
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section.
Basic use of external links in the "External links" section.
Format bullet-points and numbered lists, per Tutorial 1.