Hey!! I just wanted to suggest adding a bit more to your conclusion. Making it more direct to your body paragraphs and answering the points raised will make it flow a bit better. Good luck!! MargaretMinikin 13/10/21 4:03
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Many of the contributions used incorrect capitalisation. Titles and sub-titles should use sentence casing as listed on this page: Motivation and emotion/Book/2021.
Strive for balanced, objective reporting. If all the emotional effects are aversive why do people use synthetic cannabinoids? Are there any positive emotional effects that users report?
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, the use of learning features is excellent.
Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of image(s).
Excellent use of table(s).
Excellent use of feature box(es).
Excellent/Very good/Good/Basic/No use of quiz(zes).
Promising use of quiz(zes). 3 useful questions included. Use wiki format for quizzes. See Help:Quiz.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An opening slide with the title and sub-title is presented (also narrated the title and sub-title) - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A context for the topic is established.
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages.
Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section.
The presentation addresses the topic.
This presentation doesn't adequately address the topic.
An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
The presentation is well structured.
The presentation is poorly structured.
The selection of content is poor because it doesn't adequately use the most relevant psychological theory and/or research to address the topic.
The selection of content is problematic because it doesn't directly address the topic.
The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory.
The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological research.
The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies.
The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information.
Audio recording quality was good. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard/mouse clicks audible). Consider using an external microphone.
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used in the name of the presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Either provide details about the image sources and their copyright licenses in the presentation description or remove the presentation.
This presentation may have probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement.
A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the meta-data.